Most my life, I was focused on the end or in other words the destination. Not a totally bad thing but it is a type of thinking that causes harm in the terms of anxiety and stress. It is a pervasive way of thinking that even impacts the way you organize a desk drawer, take a family trip or do simple things like pay the bills. Destination thinking is necessary for planning but not for living, or executing on the plan. Too much destination thinking causes paralysis, consternation and way to much reevaluating.

After contemplating a destination, and considered the general framework it is necessary to suspend that type of thinking and make way for the path. That is if you want to be effective at tackling what lies directly in front of you, or finding a moment here and there to enjoy it. Focusing too much on the destination can cause you to feel overwhelmed. As you tackle one hurdle after another, you look to the horizon and think that there is no way you can make it through all of these obstacles. Contemplating the totality of all the circumstances that might be on the path is an exercise in futility and often leaves you discouraged.

Rather focus on the here and now, sufficient is the evil for you to tackle today. Consider the end, or the future in much the same way you might check a compass now and then while taking a hike. Having your head down in a map is a sure fire way to get lost, but completely ignoring the map is also a way to get lost. Consequently, we need both types of thinking, but I am starting to realize path thinking is the more frequent.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 344 – Truth as Instrument

This article explores the concept of individuals who manipulate truth to serve their own interests, distinguishing it from relativism. It delves into the personal and social implications of encountering such people, drawing parallels with childhood development and a personal anecdote about teaching chess. The author reflects on the challenges of dealing with those who view truth as an instrument and offers advice on identifying such behavior early in relationships.

Read More

Day 343 – Selling Shovels in a Gold Rush

The article draws parallels between the California Gold Rush and the current AI boom, highlighting how individuals profited by selling tools and information rather than directly extracting gold. It discusses historical examples of Samuel Brannan, Henry Vizetelly, and Joseph Ware, who capitalized on the gold rush through various means, including hoaxes and guides. The piece concludes by advising caution when encountering AI gurus, suggesting one should investigate the source of their wealth.

Read More

Day 342 – Forming an Opinion

This article explores the process of forming opinions, drawing parallels from debate and legal fields to categorize the strength of an opinion’s foundation. It highlights the difference between strong opinions and strong epistemic foundations, moving from weak bases like intuition and hearsay to robust, evidence-based conclusions that are open to revision.

Read More

Day 341 – Schadenfreude

The article discusses the lack of empathy in social media, where people often humiliate others for attention. It introduces the German word “Schadenfreude” to describe the joy derived from another’s misfortune, suggesting that understanding this concept can help people pause before posting cruel content.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x