An ancient phrase, with is a now a Swedish word that means something to the effect of being “spirited away” or “taken away.” It has a connotation of being separated from society in someway, perhaps even by mental illness or some other way of being different. It is said in some mountain communities of the Nordic that people would be stolen away at night and taken to the mountains by Trolls. These abducted people, the bergtagna, would be returned in an altered state. These are the poor folk, the downtrodden, the outcasts.

In Act II of the play Peer Gynt, Henrik Ibsen writes the following tale. Peer, runs away to the mountains with a the eldest daughter of a family he meets at a wedding. He is banished from the community by this sin and he encounters three maidens being sacrificed to trolls (a very common theme in fairy tales in the Nordic countries). He gets intoxicated, runs into a rock and spends the day in lucid day dreams. In this hallucination he comes across a woman who claims to be the daughter of the troll chieftain. Peer is propositioned that if he marries the daughter then he too can become a troll. He ultimately declines, but then the troll daughter becomes pregnant and a debate ensues as to what to do.

The big question that is at heart of the play, and most likely a symbolic question that is being asked to all of us is, “What is the difference between troll and man?” The answer from the old troll is interesting, “Out there, where sky shines, humans say: ‘To thyself be true.’ In here, trolls say: ‘Be true to yourself and to hell with the world.'”

With all the craziness going on in the world, I have decided, since browsing through the english translation of this play, that I will also now be troll. I am bergtagna. I will be true to myself and say to hell with the world!

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x