Day 163 – The value of perspective

I think too often we listen to people that agree with us, or people that are like us. We suffer from tunnel vision, not because that is what we want, because that is what we align ourselves with. This can be good in short duration where critical things need to be accomplished, however, taking a pause for perspective from alternative sources should be viewed as a necessary step toward progress.

The challenge is that people with different perspectives are not just going to give it to you. You have to reach out and try to get engage them, get past their initial barriers and specific ask for their perspective. This is not an easy thing to do, we are fearful of this, but it is necessary. Sometimes we know that what that other person is going to say is not going to be something that you like. Well, all the more reason to listen.

When you hear a different perspective, you do not need to adjust your view of even change your behavior. You are only obligated to listen and to understand. Armed with more information you can then deliberately choose to slightly modify your own perspective. I say slightly modify, because that is the wisest choice. Radical changes each time you get a new perspective can be dangerous, you can fall victim to the changing tides. Rather observe, watch, consider and carefully adopt what makes sense.

You are in charge of your own view, no one else is, however it is wise to accept counsel from the least likely of sources.

Guy Reams (163)
365 Member

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x