Never Chase Two Rabbits

Qui chasse deux lièvres n’en prend pas un. An old French Proverb that teaches that the person that chases two hares, catches none. You would understand what this really means if you have ever actually tried to chase a jack rabbit. Well, I have. Several times. Their survival instinct is to duck and dodge rapidly from side to side, backwards and forward. It would be impossible to catch two as they split apart and go in opposite directions.

This proverb points to the concept that you cannot chase to things at once. You can either pursue the one or the other, but to try to pursue both is in vain. The no man can serve two masters concept. The question is – do we really believe this?

How many times have you been torn between multiple things, and not willing to abandon one for full focus on another? You know that in your heart your focus and passion in one area is causing you to perform poorly in another, but you are not willing to give up on the potential benefits you could get if you did both.

Sure, two rabbits would make a heartier stew then one rabbit and you could imagine what that bounty would yield. However, just because you can imagine it does not mean that it will come true. You can increase your chance of rabbits stew by focusing on one rabbit. So there we have it. If we are not successful in one pursuit, then why would we try another?

Focused on one you have a greater chance of a prize. This is counter logic for some of us. We think that by spreading ourselves out we can increase the chances of catching something valuable when the exact opposite is the truth. Honestly, I am coming to grips with this as I am one that always tries to pursue multiple rabbits. Even if I were to try to chase one rabbit, I might give up mid pursuit and go after a nice healthier looking rabbit.

Maybe I am the only one with this problem, but this ancient French proverb has a truth about it that seems eternal. If I want to be really successful, maybe it is time to pick a rabbit.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More

Day 324 – Guilt Requires Action

This article explores the pervasive human experience of guilt, drawing parallels between psychological insights, religious practices, and anecdotal evidence. It highlights the importance of taking action—whether through restitution, apology, or confession—to alleviate the burden of guilt, citing examples like visitors returning stolen items to Petrified Forest National Park and personal reflections on unresolved past actions.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x