Personal Philosophy

Philosophy has many definitions, the one that has captured my attention this afternoon is the concept that a philosophy defines the ideas by which a person chooses to live their life. Now, we may question for just a moment this concept. Do people actually spend time to define their philosophy and if they do not then what?

This is the thought that I pondered today. I was thinking, if I had a concrete set of ideas that governed the way I lived my life then that would bring a sense of peace and assurance. However, I also came to the conclusion that we all have a personal philosophy whether we defined it or not. We gain it over time and yes, we can be hypocritical. The point is that as we mature we get input from a variety of sources, parents, extended family, friends, clubs, religions, associations, schools, employers. They all server as influencers in how we might define a personal set of ideas that govern our day to day decision.

The concerning thought here is that most of us go through our lives with out being consciously aware of this and therefore have an unstated philosophy that is dictating to us how we act in a given situation. Is that scary?

I think the better concept, and one that gives me a sense of direction and purpose is the fact that I could if I was so inclined, sit down and record my ideas, my philosophy and make a conscious decision to adopt them or not. Perhaps modify a bit, now that I have clearly defined them. Without some conscious thought, I run the danger of a group, system, or individual having a tremendous and potentially undue influence on my actions.

This is why religion has served such a major function in world history. Without religion, where would be? Left to our own devices, what human is actually going to sit down and contemplate the principles and rules by which they will govern their lives? They usually will not, and consequently will define their actions by a crude set of concepts that have at their root a very primal instinct. I eat because I am hungry, I reproduce when I feel the urge, I kill when I am threatened and the list goes on. Left to this natural man type of state, and society is chaos pretty quickly. Society, therefore, has had to create a series of boundaries, guidelines for living life. Philosophers, as it were, have played a very critical role in defining these ideas. In early society it was religion that afforded people the time to actually engage in this level of thought, because prior to this the daily struggle was enough to keep people focused on the immediate concerns.

You may have a religion, and if you do, pay particular note to the philosophy it sets out on how to live your life. Do you agree with them, why? Example, a religion may teach that abstinence from sexual relationships until an established agreed upon situation has developed, called Marriage for most societies. Modern society does a giant eye roll at this concept, but if you really contemplate the reason behind the principle it makes a lot of sense for maintaining a productive, healthy, and in tact social structure. You can extend this to many areas. Most religions have dietary recommendations, guidance on family structure, guidelines for priorities in life, etc.

In the absence of religion, or perhaps in addition to it, have you considered what your philosophy is. Do you have a set of guiding principles by which you can make decisions in your life? I started thinking through mine. What a tough, yet meaningful exercise. “Treat others like you would want to be treated.” This is a trite phrase, but in context with my personal philosophy, takes on a completely different impact.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 331 – Are You in Control?

Humans have a unique ability to cope with uncertainty by creating an illusion of control, often attributing cause and effect to unrelated actions. This phenomenon, explored through examples like superstitions and personal anecdotes, suggests that while we may not have complete control over our environments, our brains are wired to find patterns and connections, even if they are not always accurate. This ability to fool ourselves into believing we have more control than we do can be beneficial, but it’s important to differentiate between actual impact and coincidental association.

Read More

Day 330 – Cognitive Magic Pills

The article discusses the phenomenon of “cognitive magic pills,” which are alluring solutions to problems often peddled on social media. It uses the example of cortisol being rebranded as the “stress hormone” to illustrate how these concepts gain credibility and lead people to believe in quick fixes for complex issues. The author encourages readers to be critical of such trends and to focus on understanding their own bodies and minds rather than seeking easy solutions.

Read More

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x