The story goes that Jesus was in Jerusalem, teaching at the Temple, when nearby at the treasury people were coming and going in the act of paying their tribute or tithing to the where the custom was for people to come and offer their sacrifices. Jewish custom was for a storehouse to be established whereby followers could share a portion of their increase or excess with the people. Many of their religious customs, rites of penance, and other events of holy significance were accompanied by sacrifices and many of included tributary to God (aka his Temple). Perhaps as a teaching lesson, as Jesus was apparently good at, he gathered his followers to watch the people in the courtyard by the treasury submitting their offerings.

In ancient Jerusalem, the treasury was setup in such as way that coins could be easily submitted by dropping them into a brass funnel that would then deposit them into a large stone collection box that the priests could retrieve later. I can imagine that the wealthy, or noteworthy people would make quite a show of themselves as the contributed their coins into the treasury. Making sure that people not only saw the act, but heard it as well. The sounds of coins hitting the brass funnel was probably easy to hear over the tumult of the crowds frequent in the Temple area.

As they watched, Jesus had his follower take note of an old woman, whom he called a widow, slowly making her way to the collection area. She put two small mites into the collection funnel and slowly shuffled away. Those two mites, or Roman leptons were each half of the smallest unit of currency in Roman times. Think half of a penny. Jesus indicated that this widow had given more than anyone else because she had given all that she had.

Now, there is certainly great religious significance to this story. However, there is also a deep personal connection as well. I like to think of what was in the widow’s mind? What did she want? Was this just out of shear obligation or did she have some hope in her heart? Jesus did not comment on that. I like to think that she had a great hope, perhaps being reunited with her husband, the safety of her children, or perhaps concern and worry over her own people. Whatever it was, it was a hope and it was for that she was willing to give all that she had.

So that is the question for today. Do you have a hope that you wish to achieve? Are you willing to give all that you have to achieve it? if the answer is no, than maybe you need to question your goal, your motives and perhaps both.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x