One of the many great lessons that I have learned from the game of chess is when to think. Most people when they play chess, will think only after their opponent makes a move. The thought is, ok what do I do now? This is reactionary thinking.

The best time to really think is while it is the other players move, during their clock time. While they are pondering what to do after your move, you can now start to really formulate your plan. This is strategic thinking, something you do not get to do when you are just reacting.

Reactionary thinking is not strategic thinking. One of them you do under pressure, under constraint and with significant stress. The other you do when you do not have to. When you are not under pressure. Reactionary thinking is what you have to do, strategic is what you do voluntarily.

The interesting thing is that strategic thinking always produces better results, but requires you to dedicate time to do it. To use your spare time or to actually schedule time for this purpose. If you are just reacting you are going to lose to people that are strategic.

So you think when you do not have to. You think after you make a move and you are waiting for someone else to react. Instead of waiting for their response just so you can react again, do some strategic thinking and try to preempt their response. This puts you in a better position every time, you make your move quickly and put the burden of reacting back on the other person as fast as possible.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 331 – Are You in Control?

Humans have a unique ability to cope with uncertainty by creating an illusion of control, often attributing cause and effect to unrelated actions. This phenomenon, explored through examples like superstitions and personal anecdotes, suggests that while we may not have complete control over our environments, our brains are wired to find patterns and connections, even if they are not always accurate. This ability to fool ourselves into believing we have more control than we do can be beneficial, but it’s important to differentiate between actual impact and coincidental association.

Read More

Day 330 – Cognitive Magic Pills

The article discusses the phenomenon of “cognitive magic pills,” which are alluring solutions to problems often peddled on social media. It uses the example of cortisol being rebranded as the “stress hormone” to illustrate how these concepts gain credibility and lead people to believe in quick fixes for complex issues. The author encourages readers to be critical of such trends and to focus on understanding their own bodies and minds rather than seeking easy solutions.

Read More

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x