One of the many great lessons that I have learned from the game of chess is when to think. Most people when they play chess, will think only after their opponent makes a move. The thought is, ok what do I do now? This is reactionary thinking.

The best time to really think is while it is the other players move, during their clock time. While they are pondering what to do after your move, you can now start to really formulate your plan. This is strategic thinking, something you do not get to do when you are just reacting.

Reactionary thinking is not strategic thinking. One of them you do under pressure, under constraint and with significant stress. The other you do when you do not have to. When you are not under pressure. Reactionary thinking is what you have to do, strategic is what you do voluntarily.

The interesting thing is that strategic thinking always produces better results, but requires you to dedicate time to do it. To use your spare time or to actually schedule time for this purpose. If you are just reacting you are going to lose to people that are strategic.

So you think when you do not have to. You think after you make a move and you are waiting for someone else to react. Instead of waiting for their response just so you can react again, do some strategic thinking and try to preempt their response. This puts you in a better position every time, you make your move quickly and put the burden of reacting back on the other person as fast as possible.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 3,211 – Everything Else is Downhill

This article explores the concept of tackling the most difficult tasks first, likening it to Mark Twain’s ‘eat a live frog’ analogy or ‘going downhill’ after an initial climb. The author shares a personal anecdote about a marathon and a daily exercise routine to illustrate how front-loading challenging activities can make the rest of the day feel easier and more productive, reducing mental resistance and improving overall well-being.

Read More

Day 3,210 – Try an N-of-1 Experiment

The N-of-1 experimental design involves tracking a baseline, making one modification, and then tracking the results over time to study individual responses to an intervention. This method is particularly useful for understanding how diet, exercise, or behavioral patterns impact an individual, with a recommended tracking period of 90 days for meaningful changes.

Read More

Day 3,209 – False Hope of Guaranteed Outcomes

This piece explores the common human tendency to seek guaranteed outcomes before taking action, stemming from childhood anxieties about uncertainty. It argues that true confidence comes from trusting one’s ability to adapt to any situation, rather than waiting for external circumstances to be perfect.

Read More

Day 3,208 – The Third Category of Control

This article explores a refined Stoic concept, expanding on Epictetus’s idea of controlling what you can and not worrying about what you can’t. It introduces a third category: what you can influence, which is crucial when desired outcomes depend on others.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x