One of the many great lessons that I have learned from the game of chess is when to think. Most people when they play chess, will think only after their opponent makes a move. The thought is, ok what do I do now? This is reactionary thinking.

The best time to really think is while it is the other players move, during their clock time. While they are pondering what to do after your move, you can now start to really formulate your plan. This is strategic thinking, something you do not get to do when you are just reacting.

Reactionary thinking is not strategic thinking. One of them you do under pressure, under constraint and with significant stress. The other you do when you do not have to. When you are not under pressure. Reactionary thinking is what you have to do, strategic is what you do voluntarily.

The interesting thing is that strategic thinking always produces better results, but requires you to dedicate time to do it. To use your spare time or to actually schedule time for this purpose. If you are just reacting you are going to lose to people that are strategic.

So you think when you do not have to. You think after you make a move and you are waiting for someone else to react. Instead of waiting for their response just so you can react again, do some strategic thinking and try to preempt their response. This puts you in a better position every time, you make your move quickly and put the burden of reacting back on the other person as fast as possible.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 3,232 – Carving the Time

The author reflects on the struggle of consistently achieving meaningful work by focusing on minimum daily accomplishments, which often leads to mediocre results and burnout. They propose a strategy of fiercely protecting early morning hours (5 am to 9 am) as sacrosanct time for personal priorities, emphasizing that defending this time will eventually lead others to respect and accommodate it.

Read More

Day 3,231 – Low Tolerance for Friction?

The author explores the concept of having a low tolerance for friction, where the mental fatigue of guiding others to a conclusion already reached can lead to annoyance. The piece suggests recognizing this as a potential cause for mental anxiety and encourages understanding that others need time and justification for decisions.

Read More

Day 3,230 – You are Protecting Capacity

The author explores the source of their irritation during social interactions, realizing it stems from protecting their capacity rather than disliking people. This insight highlights the difference between ordinary social fatigue and deeper issues like stress or burnout.

Read More

Day 3,229 – What Only Time Can Reveal

This article explores the idea that the most important qualities in people, such as character, trust, and compatibility, are not immediately apparent but are revealed over time through consistent actions and repeated behaviors, especially during challenging circumstances. It suggests that true understanding of others comes from observing their consistent actions rather than relying on initial assessments or declared attributes.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x