The Danger of Identification

I found my way into to a degree program in college where I actually got my BA degree in Argumentation and Rhetoric. As part of that course of study, I become fascinated by this thinker named Kenneth Burke. Many of his works sit on my bookshelf. I did not realize it then, but I certainly do now, how much of an influence he had on my way of thinking. The way I view communications between people, especially. The motives behind the rhetoric that people use was a consistent theme in his writings.

One of the more fascinating causality behind a motive that one person might have to enter into an argument, or to assign blame, or other negativity to another person is what Burke calls, identification. Now this is a really interesting concept, and a definite topic for some serious self reflection. Here is the thought. When we communicate with someone, we cannot help but identify them in some way. We put that person into a classification. Oh, this person is one of those, or one of them, or that type. We all do it, and it is actually rooted in our core survival instinct.

Humans have this really powerful ability to discriminate. I am not talking about racism, I am talking about the ability to quickly decide if it is safe to interact with the people and things surrounding you. You have this incredible ability to discern very rapidly, you would be amazed at how many queues that you can process in just a few seconds. I think it is like 30,000 different simultaneous inputs, many of them on a subconscious level. You may think you are above judging people, but I can tell you with absolute certainty that if you are human you are are an automatic expert in rapidly determining a judgement on another person.

As a consequence we tend to identify people with things we know in order to take shortcuts in how we work with and deal with others. As a consequence we are constantly making judgement, presuppositions, predeterminations, on what we think people are thinking, what their motives are and why they behave the way they do. A vast majority of our difficulty in talking with others, or arguments we get into is because of this issue of identification.

The solution is awareness. Awareness that we are doing it and who we are comparing that person to and why were are doing that. Sometimes we are correct, at least based on the context, but often times we are not. As a consequence we need to be vigilant in looking for queues or anomalies that prove that our identification was incorrect.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x