The thing about potential is that it is uncapped, unlimited as long as you are alive. When you die, there goes the potential. While alive, you can force your will on the world and actually make things change. When you are dead, there is nothing you can do to impose your will. Potential is only for the living.

Potential does not really diminish all that much. We talk like it does. Younger people are said to have great potential, but the reality is that if you are breathing, you have potential. Potential does not have degrees, because you cannot set levels or categories on infinite space. All potential is unlimited.

Now you can limit yourself. That is easy, you are doing it right now. The thing is that you need to start living, which effectively means accessing potential. If you are truly alive, then you are trying to strive for potential, or perhaps you are dead?

If you do nothing, you get nothing. I learned that elementary school. Multiply by 0 you get 0. Guy

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 330 – Cognitive Magic Pills

The article discusses the phenomenon of “cognitive magic pills,” which are alluring solutions to problems often peddled on social media. It uses the example of cortisol being rebranded as the “stress hormone” to illustrate how these concepts gain credibility and lead people to believe in quick fixes for complex issues. The author encourages readers to be critical of such trends and to focus on understanding their own bodies and minds rather than seeking easy solutions.

Read More

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x