He “just rubs me the wrong way,” is a comment I heard recently about someone. I was in a discussion about leaders in my company and someone made this comment about another person. I kept thinking about this comment. The person that said this, really felt like this was justification for their negative view of another person in the company. I think what she meant was that the other person causes friction, creates uncomfortable conversations.

So I am wondering, is that a bad thing?

Maybe “rubbing the wrong way” is actually a good thing? I know we would all like everyone to agree with us all the time, to let us do whatever we want, to allow things to happen in a friction less manner. However, is that the best thing for you? The answer to that question is unfortunately, no. You may want a nice and smooth path, but that well travelled road just does not lead to success. If someone does rub you the wrong way, perhaps you need to take a considerable pause in your thinking and ask yourself, why?

Also, do you find yourself agreeing with your leadership, agreeing with everyone to be perceived as a cooperative enabling sort of person? If that is the case, I hate to be the bearer of bad news. Most successful leaders do NOT want that behavior. They actually WANT to be rubbed the wrong way! Of course there is a difference between offering an alternative view and being downright obstinate. At some point, usually when a final decision is made you need to flip to being a supporter and not the antagonist. However, rubbing the wrong way needs to be considered a good thing until a decision is made.

So go ahead and rub people the wrong way!

Guy

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 331 – Are You in Control?

Humans have a unique ability to cope with uncertainty by creating an illusion of control, often attributing cause and effect to unrelated actions. This phenomenon, explored through examples like superstitions and personal anecdotes, suggests that while we may not have complete control over our environments, our brains are wired to find patterns and connections, even if they are not always accurate. This ability to fool ourselves into believing we have more control than we do can be beneficial, but it’s important to differentiate between actual impact and coincidental association.

Read More

Day 330 – Cognitive Magic Pills

The article discusses the phenomenon of “cognitive magic pills,” which are alluring solutions to problems often peddled on social media. It uses the example of cortisol being rebranded as the “stress hormone” to illustrate how these concepts gain credibility and lead people to believe in quick fixes for complex issues. The author encourages readers to be critical of such trends and to focus on understanding their own bodies and minds rather than seeking easy solutions.

Read More

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x