Jevron’s Number

William Stanley Jevron in a book called Principles of Science claimed that no one would ever know what two numbers he multiplied together to get to 8,616,460,799. The concept was that it is easy to multiply two prime numbers together, but really difficult to determine what the factors were to get to that number. He asked this question in 1874, before any rudimentary computers. Fifteen years later, in an article published in 1889, Charles Busk created a methodology on how to find factors of any proposed number. The process before that was to effectively run through every prime number and try it to see if it divided into the number with no remainder. I read the article, is was printed in Nature Magazine in Feb. 28th 1889. He solved the problem, published the results. Without getting too technical, he basically figured out a way to break the number into smaller chunks, allowing it to be much easier to determine using known primes. He was able to solve Jevron’s number in two minutes, whereas people were still working on that problem for over a decade. BTW, just in case you are curious the solution to Jevron’s number is 89,681 X 96,079. It would not be until 1996 that the mathematician, Solomon Golomb would demonstrate how to solve a problem like this on a household pocket calculator.

So this was a unsolvable problem, that actual was quite solvable. Although Jevron issued the formal challenge, you can go all the way back to 196 B.C. with Greek mathematicians, such as Eratosthenes that posed this challenge. I thought about this last night as my 11 year old daughter was solving the factorization of a complex number. Little does she know that the the problem that she was solving for was using a methodology that had alluded the brightest minds in all human history for thousands of years. That is incredible, really. Humans are really amazing, complex creatures.

There are so many unsung heroes of the modern age that have solved incredibly complex problems that we take for granted. One of my favorites is a man named Ralph Merkle, who is still alive. You could actually reach out and talk to one of the people that had the greatest influence in modern society, and no one really knows it. Just to give you a quick glance. One of the biggest problems in modern security is the ability to transfer an encryption key back and forth between two parties. How do you do a key exchange between parties that might not know each other and are a significant distance apart? You cannot just electronically send it to them, because then anyone could get a copy. Well Merkle created the concept of how to do this. Now he did not completely perfect the idea, that came later but the concept was significant. Merkle also created the concept of contention resistant compression, which inadvertently led to the development of an algorithm that could take a block of data and convert it to a discrete data set of the same size, known as a hash. These two ideas led to Public Key Cryptography (the way you send you credit card to Amazon over the Internet) and the SHA256 algorithm (the method used to encrypt those bitcoins that you are buying right now).

Not sure why I am sharing this. Just gives me hope for humanity I guess!

Guy Reams

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 330 – Cognitive Magic Pills

The article discusses the phenomenon of “cognitive magic pills,” which are alluring solutions to problems often peddled on social media. It uses the example of cortisol being rebranded as the “stress hormone” to illustrate how these concepts gain credibility and lead people to believe in quick fixes for complex issues. The author encourages readers to be critical of such trends and to focus on understanding their own bodies and minds rather than seeking easy solutions.

Read More

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x