Sometimes you just got to talk things out. Can you? Are you willing to accept that you are potentially wrong or not thinking right? Are you willing to accept that the other party has a point of view that is legitimate? I notice that we spend a lot of time and energy avoiding conversations, and  / or dancing around issues that are unresolved. My wife taught me this. For years I was annoyed because she would see the obvious thing that was not stated clearly and agreed upon and drag it out into the open for clarification. I would always cringe at this and would find it annoying, however, as I have gotten older I realized that I was the one that was being annoying. There is nothing wrong with calling out the elephant in the room, in fact it is rather healthy.

So someone like me is ill equipped to have the tough conversation, because I have spent a lot of time in my life avoiding it. There is a lot you can learn by spending time really researching how to have effective interpersonal conversations. I learned a good one today.

The concept is to set the ground rules of the conversation before the tough talk begins. First establish that this is going to be a tough conversation. You might say, I think we need to talk about the elephant. We are both going to be emotional about this. We are probably not going to agree. However, I think we both would like a resolution, so do you want to first talk about the ground rules for this discussion first? That is an interesting way to start the conversation because it is disarming. It also sets you up to have success early on. Most people can agree to some basic premises. You might try rules like – 1. We will not talk over each other. We will let each other finish before we start talking. 2. We will only talk for an hour, if we cannot resolve our differences in 1 hour then we reschedule for another time. In fact, you might want to consider when to talk next BEFORE you start talking about the Elephant. 3. When we find something we agree with, we will write it down so we can remember what we actually do agree on. 4. We both accept that we will have to come up with a compromise. This means for us to agree, with both admit before the conversation starts that we will have to give up something.

Anyway, I also learned a few other things. However, the amount of time we spend talking to other people, perhaps it would be healthy and wise to invest in some interpersonal communication skills!

Guy Reams

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 350 – Learning to Triangulate

The article explains the concept of triangulation, drawing parallels between its use in surveying and navigation to its application in evaluating information. It emphasizes the importance of cross-referencing multiple independent sources to determine truth, especially in an age of misinformation and AI-generated content. The author argues that accepting information at face value is no longer viable and that triangulation should become a default reaction.

Read More

Day 349 – The Practice of Conceptual Decomposition

This article explores the author’s accidental discovery of conceptual decomposition as a superpower. Initially used to overcome learning difficulties, this method of breaking down complex systems into understandable parts proved invaluable in their career, particularly in teaching and computer science. The author advocates for applying this technique when interacting with AI to achieve more accurate and reliable results.

Read More

Day 348 – First Things First

The author shares their experience of maintaining seven daily habits for over 3,181 days, emphasizing the importance of doing crucial tasks first thing in the morning. They advise tackling life-changing habits immediately upon waking to avoid procrastination and increase the likelihood of completion, drawing on personal examples like early morning runs.

Read More

Day 347 – What is ‘having faith?’

A spiritual leader’s daily ritual of questioning his beliefs profoundly impacted the author, leading to a decades-long quest to understand the true meaning of faith. The author concludes that faith is not mere belief, but rather an active pursuit in the absence of proof, contrasting it with complacency that can arise from dormant beliefs.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x