The concept of on versus in is important. Difficult to grasp at first, but once you start to change your thinking it becomes rather obvious. I went a long time without really understanding this concept. I was introduced to the idea by Michael Gerber’s E-Myth book. However, I did not really understand. I went right along confusing the concepts.

I have finally started to make meaning out of this in such a way as to change my behavior. The notion that there are times when I need to work on something, and other times I need to work in it. They are both equally important, but must be compartmentalized enough so that you focus appropriately.

When you work on something, you are improving it. You are working on the system, the process. When you work in something, you are actually performing the process and achieving the real work. The two without out each other are failures. In and on together are harmony. The blend of planning and work needed to be successful at anything.

I have been focused on my backyard gardening, a sort of way to provide me inspiration that I was missing. This last week I tried to improve the health of my plants. The watering of these plants is obviously pivotal to their health. I need to spend time actually watering plants and fixing how they are being watered. That is work. That is working in the process. However, I also needed to spend some time working on this problem. I created a system of measuring water output from my drip system and once I had that, then I knew exactly what watering components to use and when.

Of course I could spend a month planning a watering system and not actually get anything done. That would cause death to my plants. If I try to water without a system, I will inevitably fail and the plants will be overwatered or under watered. I must work on the process and in the process in a balanced way to have ultimate success.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 309 – The Price Tag of Automation

The author recounts his frustrating experience with home automation after Google abandoned its Nest architecture, leading him to build his own system. He highlights the significant time and effort required for maintenance and the eventual abandonment of his automation efforts due to the high ‘economic life’ cost. However, with the advent of AI, the cost and effort of automation have decreased, making it more feasible and renewing his interest in deploying future automations.

Read More

Day 308 – Speed is The Champion

This article explores the concept that speed often leads to success in various fields, from business to technology and sports. It argues that systems capable of rapid action, feedback, and adjustment tend to outperform those focused on avoiding errors. The author highlights the importance of fast feedback loops, citing John Boyd’s OODA loop and its application in AI systems. The piece also discusses the speed-accuracy tradeoff, noting that while speed can lead to more mistakes, these are often recoverable, and the compounding effect of rapid learning ultimately drives better results.

Read More

Day 307 – Iterative Could be Insufficient

This article explores the contrast between iterative and linear thinking, highlighting their respective strengths and weaknesses. It argues that while iterative thinking is beneficial in many fields, it can sometimes be an excuse for insufficient upfront planning, and proposes a hybrid approach for more robust decision-making.

Read More

Day 306 – The Zeigarnik Effect

The article explores the psychological relief gained from writing down unfinished tasks and concerns, linking it to the Zeigarnik Effect. It explains how externalizing thoughts through writing can free the mind from constantly remembering and worrying about unresolved issues, allowing for greater mental peace and the ability to conclude the day effectively.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x