Those that are strong do not “faint in the day of adversity” but rather purposefully fail when they are comfortable. When everything is going good, is when the strong will seek to test boundaries, push new limits and stretch their own personal capabilities. The person that is weak, often pretends, and when that adversity really comes they are unable to actually be strong and therefore faint. Fainting is not failure.

Failure is a deliberate outcome. We train to failure. We measure the point at which we fail and repeat the process of seeking the point at which failure is good. Failure is a paradigm that the successful find themselves not only in, but constantly seeking. The foolish person, the pretender, will avoid failure and be afraid of it. They view failure in a negative connotation and hide it from the view of others. Failure to them is an admission. To the strong, failure is a process.

Those that are strong, are in a constant state of failure. They fail frequently and often so that when the time comes to perform they do not faint. Those that are weak are constantly avoiding failure. They never fail and pretend they have success so that when the time comes to perform they faint. To put it simply, you can tell when you are in association with a strong person because when the going gets tough, or the time to perform is at hand, that person does not faint, withdrawal or make excuses. They are ready, willing, and capable of continuing the fight.

The weak are the first to quit, the first to find excuse. They cannot tolerate opposition or adversity. When the time comes when they must perform they are unable to do so, they faint, fall apart, and are unable to sustain any length of duration in adversity. Real training therefore is real effort under conditions that will cause you to fail. You absolutely must work to failure when you are preparing so that when you need to perform you do not faint.

This is brutally hard to do. This would be the separation between a real athlete and someone who only wants to be athletic. Real athletes are in training programs that induce frequent failure and recovery. People that want to be athletic, merely wear the clothes, hold the memberships, read the books, but in reality all their efforts always cut short, way before failure. Failing must get you to the point of being uncomfortable. Which means that when you are trying to prepare to be what you want to be, then you have to go through a lot of times when you push yourself to the point of failure, repeatedly. You must be uncomfortable to be successful.

So contrary to the mindset of almost everyone, failure is an option, it is the only option. Failure is the goal of your preparation. You seek to fail, want to fail, and work continuously until you do fail. When you fail, you learn, you grow, you improve. During recovery you reflect on what went wrong so that you can improve, and improve you will. It is fainting when you need to perform that you are actually trying to avoid. Fainting during adversity is what any plan of self improvement should be trying to avoid, not failure.

When should you push to failure? When you are comfortable, when you should be training. So stop being comfortable and start failing so that you will not faint when it counts. Whether your ambition is to be an athlete, investor, artist, or inventor you must adopt a program of failure during times of comfort so that when you need to perform you do not faint.

Guy Reams (1079)

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 310 – I Actually Love Opera

The author explores the reasons why people might hesitate to reveal certain aspects of themselves, using their love for opera as an example. They differentiate between privacy and concealment, arguing that while privacy is a healthy boundary, concealment stems from a fear of judgment and can be a burden. The piece concludes by advocating for the freedom found in being less concerned with labels and more comfortable with revealing one’s true complexity.

Read More

Day 309 – The Price Tag of Automation

The author recounts his frustrating experience with home automation after Google abandoned its Nest architecture, leading him to build his own system. He highlights the significant time and effort required for maintenance and the eventual abandonment of his automation efforts due to the high ‘economic life’ cost. However, with the advent of AI, the cost and effort of automation have decreased, making it more feasible and renewing his interest in deploying future automations.

Read More

Day 308 – Speed is The Champion

This article explores the concept that speed often leads to success in various fields, from business to technology and sports. It argues that systems capable of rapid action, feedback, and adjustment tend to outperform those focused on avoiding errors. The author highlights the importance of fast feedback loops, citing John Boyd’s OODA loop and its application in AI systems. The piece also discusses the speed-accuracy tradeoff, noting that while speed can lead to more mistakes, these are often recoverable, and the compounding effect of rapid learning ultimately drives better results.

Read More

Day 307 – Iterative Could be Insufficient

This article explores the contrast between iterative and linear thinking, highlighting their respective strengths and weaknesses. It argues that while iterative thinking is beneficial in many fields, it can sometimes be an excuse for insufficient upfront planning, and proposes a hybrid approach for more robust decision-making.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x