I just got off the phone with BJ Fogg, PhD, Behavioral Scientist @ Stanford University. I have been scouring the Internet looking for sources to validate that the principles that I have been using to formulate my opinions on habit formation and keeping commitments are correct. I went through The 365 Commitment with Dr. Fogg, and after I was done he said the following, well if you are seeking validation that you are correct, well you have it. I concur, you are absolutely on to something. He indicated that over 300 weeks of clinical research and data points to the fact that the concepts that led me to success with habit formation are absolutely true.

Yup, The 365 Commitment just got validated by one the top most authorities on habit formation. Now you have no excuse not to read my blogs and take action! BJ Fogg does a better job of explaining his model in a recent Ted Talk. Check it out here.

Wow, scientific validation feels great. This has helped me to focus more on the steps required for habit formation. To take them more seriously. Clearly, I have discovered something. There has to be something to this process. After all, I think I have created at least 14 new life changing habits in the last few years. Prior to that, I did not have even one good habit that I could point to. Now I have 14. Decades and decades of trying and failing and now in two years, I am having repeated success. So definitely, something is clicking.

You need motivation to start a habit, no doubt about it. However, motivation is not enough. It will go way, and usually very quickly. During the time you have motivation you need to establish two things very quickly. Both of these things are required, because without them you will fail. You need a trigger and then you need to make sure that the difficulty level is low. Triggers are something that prompts you into action. Think Pavlov and the dinner bell. Difficulty is equally important. If you cannot achieve it, you will quit. It needs to be sufficiently easy to allow the habit time to grow.

BJ Fogg uses the concept of a plant, that you have to nurture and grow. You just simply cannot put too heavy a load on that pour plant and expect it to survive. You have to nurture it. The difficulty level needs to be your lowest common denominator. If you cannot do 5, then do 1. If you cannot lift 20, then do 10. If you cannot go 10, then go 5. The point is develop the habit first with less difficulty, then when the plant is strong add more strain.

Guy Reams (639)

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 352 – Habits are Foundation

This article discusses the importance of developing habits for personal transformation. It emphasizes that consistent, small habits lead to inevitable success and reduce reliance on motivation or discipline. The key is to engage in the principal action related to your desired outcome every day, as repetition is the best way to fix behavior.

Read More

Day 351 – The Real Risk is Not the Start

Many people fear starting new initiatives due to the perceived risk of initial failure. However, the beginning often offers easy gains and quick successes. The real challenge arises after these initial successes, when progress plateaus and requires significantly more effort, skill, or a change in strategy.

Read More

Day 350 – Learning to Triangulate

The article explains the concept of triangulation, drawing parallels between its use in surveying and navigation to its application in evaluating information. It emphasizes the importance of cross-referencing multiple independent sources to determine truth, especially in an age of misinformation and AI-generated content. The author argues that accepting information at face value is no longer viable and that triangulation should become a default reaction.

Read More

Day 349 – The Practice of Conceptual Decomposition

This article explores the author’s accidental discovery of conceptual decomposition as a superpower. Initially used to overcome learning difficulties, this method of breaking down complex systems into understandable parts proved invaluable in their career, particularly in teaching and computer science. The author advocates for applying this technique when interacting with AI to achieve more accurate and reliable results.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x