Jesus had one thing definitely right. It is a major life principle, that is really, really hard to learn. I am still struggling with it. It is the concept of turning the other cheek. The phrase is taken from the recorded sermon called, “the Sermon on the Mount” and says: “whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.” This was preceded by the concept of loving your enemies.

I will not tackle the love the enemies thing, but the turn the cheek thing is very interesting. It has spawned some very interesting concepts throughout the modern era. You will find justification for anarchism here, and the non-resistance movement, prison reform, and all sorts of philosophies. However, here is a concept that I like to take from this teaching.

Turn the other cheek does not necessarily mean that when someone hits you, that you expose the other cheek for them to strike you again. I can see how someone could make that interpretation. Perhaps that passive non-resistance is a way to get what you want as it will remove all the passion out of the attacker. Gandhi, MLK, and others definitely used this concept to their advantage.

I think it means something much different. Sometimes when you are faced with an attack, persecution, or other threat perhaps it is best to just walk away. You do not have to fight every battle and you certainly do not have to win every battle. That maybe our thought, someone attacks us, then we must fight back. However, perhaps, it would be to our advantage, or to a greater positive gain for ourselves by simply just turning and walking away. If we are so absorbed by personal pride that we will take on every battle in an effort to win and exert our dominance then we will get more of the same in return. Effectively, by responding to conflict, we get get conflict and lots more of it.

So perhaps, the best thing to do is to focus on forgiveness, helping and loving other people rather then choosing to fight with the angry malicious ones. Focus on the good people, the people that can actually benefit from our help first, the people that can help you. Why is it in our nature to fight the people resisting us? We should instead turn the other cheek and focus on the people we can help and the people that can help us.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 331 – Are You in Control?

Humans have a unique ability to cope with uncertainty by creating an illusion of control, often attributing cause and effect to unrelated actions. This phenomenon, explored through examples like superstitions and personal anecdotes, suggests that while we may not have complete control over our environments, our brains are wired to find patterns and connections, even if they are not always accurate. This ability to fool ourselves into believing we have more control than we do can be beneficial, but it’s important to differentiate between actual impact and coincidental association.

Read More

Day 330 – Cognitive Magic Pills

The article discusses the phenomenon of “cognitive magic pills,” which are alluring solutions to problems often peddled on social media. It uses the example of cortisol being rebranded as the “stress hormone” to illustrate how these concepts gain credibility and lead people to believe in quick fixes for complex issues. The author encourages readers to be critical of such trends and to focus on understanding their own bodies and minds rather than seeking easy solutions.

Read More

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x