So book clubs are an interesting thought. My wife used to belong to one, I loved to listen to the storied when she would come back. 50% about the book, 50% about the lives of the people that were in the club. One of the problems with interpersonal communication is the inability for people to engage in meaningful conversation. It is like they need some kindling for the fire, so to speak. Book clubs are a great way for that to happen. I remember when I was a kid, my mom would throw “tupperware” parties. I am not sure if anyone every sold any tupperware, but they sure would have a lot of fun talking and carrying on while some pour soul tried to demonstrate how to peel an orange using the new tupperware orange peeler device.

Many of us struggle in having conversations with our children, spouses, family, friends and even colleagues because we do not have a comfortable way to engage in real conversation. We are fearful of how someone will react to disclosure. As a consequence we are guarded about what we say and how we respond. When we have a topic at hand, a spark to a conversation, we can start to free flow our thoughts. This is how relationships get built, lasting ones.

I am thinking about this a lot lately. How can I manufacture reasons to talk with my colleagues, my team, my family? I cannot ignore how important conversation is. I need to think about how to do this effectively.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x