Our unique quality as a species is the ability to view reality, perceive it as it related to us, and then make a quick determination and judgement of that reality based on what is not there. I called it “the not.” There are some existential philosophies that outline that understanding what is not here is a key ingredient to the formulation of many human traits including the use of tools, symbols, language and communication systems. Our constant desire to create hierarchy is directly tied to the fact that we can rank things by what they do NOT have. In fact, our kinship to a belief in God is also directly associated with this concept. We identify an external being, an idealistic representation and that becomes the definition by which we judge all that is NOT.

There is no other living species that we know of that has the ability to do this. A young baby, very early on in development learns to play peek a boo and by so doing learns the concept of object permanence and recognizes when something is here or not here. That seems rudimentary, but the fact that we think that is simple, just demonstrates how advanced that concept really is. What we do not realize is just how powerful this concept is in our own lives.

We should never accept just the reality in front of us, we must always consider the NOT. That is our secret super power. You innately do it all the time, but it is definitely something to get better at, to focus on and to help create a better more ideal reality by becoming tuned to what is NOT correct, or not right.

Guy

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x