I remember when we were thinking about selling our first home. I knew several real estate agents that were all saying the same thing, this market is going to continue to go up, we are not in a bubble, this is going to last at least another 10 years. When I heard them all saying the same thing, I started to get really suspicious. Sounded like they were all reassuring themselves, as if they could change the outcome by simply repeating the opposite of what they knew would happen. I had this feeling that what I should do is sell the house, wait about a year, and then buy a new home. As it turned out, I should have listened to that internal voice, because in 6 months the bubble burst and the market plummeted. If I would have sold my house then and held onto the cash, then my buying power would have increased by almost 50%.

I did not do that, unfortunately. However, I bring this example up to talk about bubble thinking. We are all susceptible to it and we do it all the time. If we surround ourselves with people that say the same things and repeat what we want to hear then we are in real danger of thinking that what we are hearing and seeing all the time is the truth of the situation. How dangerous that is. You see examples of that all the time. The question is, are we guilty of the same and do not even know it?

I met an executive for a company a few days ago, and she was a really brilliant and capable person. However, during the discussion she had this dialog going on that must have made sense to her, but the way it came out was really confusing. Her ideas must have been tested internally, and repeated back to her, but when she started to communicate that talk track to others it just did not gel very well. This is an example of bubble thinking. If you talk to your friends and colleagues about your ideas and they understand what you are trying to do and want you to succeed then you will get a lot of positive affirmation. However, is that always good?

I think we need to learn to value people that tell us things we do not want to hear. People that are able to see the alternative view, and force us out of our bubble and think about what we are trying to do from a different angle. Are all the parrots nodding back at you as valuable as the seagull that is constantly dive bombing you and disrupting your lunch?

Guy Reams

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x