Napoleon Technique

Napoleon was perhaps one of the most successful political and military leaders of all time. Of course he made some bad decisions, and you may or may not agree with this ambition but you certainly cannot deny his effectiveness. He had a technique for dealing with problems, that we can perhaps learn from. It is called the Napoleon technique. You can look it up, lots of people have written on this topic. It is particularly important for our modern age with all the distractions with have to deal with all the time. One of the reasons he was successful was his incredible focus on his ambition, his goal. He let nothing sway him and in so doing achieved rapid success. He died at 51 years of age, pretty young for a person that established himself as a household name and one of most recognized people ever to be born.

His technique was to ignore incoming mail for 3 days. If he got correspondence, he would ignore it for 3 days and then open it then. If the communication was still important then and had not resolved itself then he would go ahead and deal with it at that time. He determined that most problems brought to him, would resolve themselves and require no distraction from him.

Now is this a good technique? I think it could be, if implemented properly. We should not use this technique as an excuse to procrastinate requirements or responsibility for instance. Imagine this. You only process any inbound communications, email, text messages, snail mail, whatever, only after 3 days. Now that may sound crazy, but think about it. How many things would no longer require your attention after 3 days? Quite a bit I imagine. You could actually choose to not look at communication, until one specific time during the week. For example, I only read email on Tuesdays and Fridays. What would that do? How much time would you free up?

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x