Napoleon Technique

Napoleon was perhaps one of the most successful political and military leaders of all time. Of course he made some bad decisions, and you may or may not agree with this ambition but you certainly cannot deny his effectiveness. He had a technique for dealing with problems, that we can perhaps learn from. It is called the Napoleon technique. You can look it up, lots of people have written on this topic. It is particularly important for our modern age with all the distractions with have to deal with all the time. One of the reasons he was successful was his incredible focus on his ambition, his goal. He let nothing sway him and in so doing achieved rapid success. He died at 51 years of age, pretty young for a person that established himself as a household name and one of most recognized people ever to be born.

His technique was to ignore incoming mail for 3 days. If he got correspondence, he would ignore it for 3 days and then open it then. If the communication was still important then and had not resolved itself then he would go ahead and deal with it at that time. He determined that most problems brought to him, would resolve themselves and require no distraction from him.

Now is this a good technique? I think it could be, if implemented properly. We should not use this technique as an excuse to procrastinate requirements or responsibility for instance. Imagine this. You only process any inbound communications, email, text messages, snail mail, whatever, only after 3 days. Now that may sound crazy, but think about it. How many things would no longer require your attention after 3 days? Quite a bit I imagine. You could actually choose to not look at communication, until one specific time during the week. For example, I only read email on Tuesdays and Fridays. What would that do? How much time would you free up?

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 308 – Speed is The Champion

This article explores the concept that speed often leads to success in various fields, from business to technology and sports. It argues that systems capable of rapid action, feedback, and adjustment tend to outperform those focused on avoiding errors. The author highlights the importance of fast feedback loops, citing John Boyd’s OODA loop and its application in AI systems. The piece also discusses the speed-accuracy tradeoff, noting that while speed can lead to more mistakes, these are often recoverable, and the compounding effect of rapid learning ultimately drives better results.

Read More

Day 307 – Iterative Could be Insufficient

This article explores the contrast between iterative and linear thinking, highlighting their respective strengths and weaknesses. It argues that while iterative thinking is beneficial in many fields, it can sometimes be an excuse for insufficient upfront planning, and proposes a hybrid approach for more robust decision-making.

Read More

Day 306 – The Zeigarnik Effect

The article explores the psychological relief gained from writing down unfinished tasks and concerns, linking it to the Zeigarnik Effect. It explains how externalizing thoughts through writing can free the mind from constantly remembering and worrying about unresolved issues, allowing for greater mental peace and the ability to conclude the day effectively.

Read More

Day 305 – The Treasure He Never Found

A young man spends his life chasing riches, fame, and glory, only to find repeated failures. In his old age, surrounded by his loving family, he realizes that the true treasure he sought was not in external achievements but in the relationships and character he built along the way.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x