Power, which seems to be in vogue these days, is not really something that is granted, given, or reallocated. Power, true power, is harnessed from within. Your ability to influence the world around you is not something bestowed on you by an authority figure. Your ability to influence comes from a well spring of an internal reservoir. An authority figure can grant you a title, or perhaps permission but the actual ability, or power, to lead others is entirely earned.

Unfortunately, I hear and see people advocating something entirely different. Power to influence others, as it seems, is treated as if it was an honor bestowed by those in power. As if being in power is the same thing as exercising power. We learn very quickly when those bestowed with title, or the supposed transference of power, that they are as the emperor that wears no clothes. No more ability to wield power than a newborn baby.

You can pretend all you want to that the transfer of title will make you a great leader. When that fateful moment comes, you will realize very quickly that there is no Gin that grants your wishes. Your ability to lead is something earned via the refiners fire, never is a sharp, tempered blade forged in an instant.

This mistaken identification of power as a noun, an object, that can be transferred is an error of reason that only the weak ever make. To be strong, is to be one that has earned power and recognizes that the exercise of it is action, a repeated action, that you have learned over the course of time.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x