It is amazing how many strategies humans will develop to avoid contention, risk and workload. Many of these you will easily recognize. Procrastination, passive-aggressive behavior, and one of my favorites constant rumination. These are the things we most commonly do to avoid uncomfortable things. We push things off (procrastinate), we attack other things (passive-aggressive), and we just think about it and think about it ad nauseum (ruminate).

However, I want to point out an insidious one that we do not really notice. I am guilty of it myself, and once I recognized it, I now see it much easier. I am shocked by how often that I do it, and this behavior is best called avoidance coping. Simply stated, this is the tendency of us humans to avoid the thing causing us stress and instead avoid them completely and worry about something else instead.

Here is the problem, we think we are reducing stress by avoidance coping. We think that by pushing the stressor aside that we are lowering our stress issues. The reality is that that this strategy compounds and we end up far more stressed out than the avoidance strategy intended to reduce.

What I have been working on is to replace avoidance coping with a more active process of coping with stress. Instead of stress management, or stress avoidance I am working with how to cope with stress. For example, talking through problems, budgeting my time to focus on certain things, and reconsidering the positive areas of my life and actively choosing to focus on them.

Stress should be dealt with as an active, proactive methodology and not a passive avoidance behavior which ends up compounding stress.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x