I have noticed a general trend with us humans, including myself. When we get a certain “feeling” about something we like to express ourselves in our minds and to those that will listen to us in general terms. For example. My desk is a mess right now. Specifically I have a bunch of loose items sitting on my desk that have not been put in their proper place. So I have a feeling that my personal life is a little disorganized. So I came home today, looked at my desk, and said out loud to anyone that would listen, “this whole house is a freaking mess.”

That is not actually true at all, not even close. What is true, specifically, is that my desk in my office is messy. That is the true statement and if I were to fix that, I would no longer feel like my life was in shambles. So this is my new concept, be specific.

People tell me all the time that “<insert idea here> is all messed up.” The problem is that you really cannot do anything with that at all. You cannot take action on it. You could not fix that even if you had all the power in the world. When someone says, this whole thing is screwed up – reply with, can you be specific? What exactly is not working correctly? Funny thing is most people will only be able to name one or perhaps two things that are actually not working.

Think of this when you talk to a boss, coworker, spouse, child. Instead of saying to your kid, you are really irresponsible (a general concept), be specific. You need to focus on improving your math grade, because a F in math is not acceptable. That is specific and actionable. Same goes for your complaining. Do not tell a boss, hey boss, this company is jacked up. That is not helpful, what is the boss going to do with that? Instead name a specific problem and what is not working. That is actionable and real.

The more specific you are in your life about your problems, the more results you will get and the better you will feel about your circumstances. A depressed person is never depressed about something specific, it is always in sweeping generalities.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x