Day 207 – No New Thing Under the Sun

King Solomon, or at least one of his hired courtesans, recorded the following in the Book of Ecclesiastes: “The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.” This may have been a commentary on the cyclical nature of life and human history, but I have always considered this phrase in terms of innovation.

Many people have equated a new innovative idea with starting a business. “That is a great idea,” they will say, quickly following up with, “You should start a business.”  This leads us to this bias on what entrepreneurship is. We equate it with new ideas, new innovation, and new disruptive ways of doing things. Each generation has had a new innovation to point to and say, “I wish I would have thought of that.” For example, we use the example of Uber as a completely disruptive and new business model when referencing this idea of businesses requiring something new under the sun.

However, there is no new thing under the sun; the ancient biblical author was correct. Uber was not the first. The concept of ride-sharing and carpooling has been around for a long time. Taxi services were already experimenting with booking rides with online tools, and there were already services in play that used a similar methodology. I think I remember Zimride in San Francisco a few years before Uber even existed. We can even look at the greatest technological advancement in our time, the Apple iPhone. This was not a new innovation at all but rather a coalescence of the state of innovation at the time. The iPhone was launched in 1997, but there were already samples of devices like this going all the way back to 1992. Take a look at images of the IBM Simon, and you will be astonished at how far and fast the technology has come in just five years.

This leads me to an incredibly important concept about entrepreneurship. Most amazing businesses did not create new ideas. Instead, they improved upon what was already happening. This is the typical scenario; a brand-new invention with a completely new and disruptive concept is exceedingly rare. Even with patents created, a significant amount of the process is based on searching for relevant patents, similarities, and other sources. There is a requirement to differentiate your invention, and you must carefully explain your improvements. I have read through several patents in areas that I am interested in, and without exception, there is a great deal of focus on similar prior inventions in the same domain.

All of the darlings of the innovative tech space are improvements rather than brand-new concepts, like Apple and Uber. Netflix was not the first to create subscription-based streaming, Amazon was not the first to sell products on the Internet, Tesla did not create the first battery-powered car, and Airbnb was not the first to come up with the idea of renting your home out to a traveler.

The conclusion is this. If you want to create a great business and you also want to be successful, then do not waste your time seeking a new idea that will fall miraculously from the heavens. Rather, look at what is already going on and how you might improve something and make it better. That is more likely than not the secret to a successful path.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x