One of the many great lessons that I have learned from the game of chess is when to think. Most people when they play chess, will think only after their opponent makes a move. The thought is, ok what do I do now? This is reactionary thinking.

The best time to really think is while it is the other players move, during their clock time. While they are pondering what to do after your move, you can now start to really formulate your plan. This is strategic thinking, something you do not get to do when you are just reacting.

Reactionary thinking is not strategic thinking. One of them you do under pressure, under constraint and with significant stress. The other you do when you do not have to. When you are not under pressure. Reactionary thinking is what you have to do, strategic is what you do voluntarily.

The interesting thing is that strategic thinking always produces better results, but requires you to dedicate time to do it. To use your spare time or to actually schedule time for this purpose. If you are just reacting you are going to lose to people that are strategic.

So you think when you do not have to. You think after you make a move and you are waiting for someone else to react. Instead of waiting for their response just so you can react again, do some strategic thinking and try to preempt their response. This puts you in a better position every time, you make your move quickly and put the burden of reacting back on the other person as fast as possible.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 311 – Finding Someone is Probability Problem

This article explores the idea that finding a partner, or any new relationship, is fundamentally a probability problem influenced by one’s environment. It suggests that by changing the environments we inhabit, we can increase the number and variety of people we meet, foster repeated exposure for deeper connections, and create new ‘weak ties’ that expand our social universe, ultimately leading to more opportunities for meaningful relationships.

Read More

Day 310 – I Actually Love Opera

The author explores the reasons why people might hesitate to reveal certain aspects of themselves, using their love for opera as an example. They differentiate between privacy and concealment, arguing that while privacy is a healthy boundary, concealment stems from a fear of judgment and can be a burden. The piece concludes by advocating for the freedom found in being less concerned with labels and more comfortable with revealing one’s true complexity.

Read More

Day 309 – The Price Tag of Automation

The author recounts his frustrating experience with home automation after Google abandoned its Nest architecture, leading him to build his own system. He highlights the significant time and effort required for maintenance and the eventual abandonment of his automation efforts due to the high ‘economic life’ cost. However, with the advent of AI, the cost and effort of automation have decreased, making it more feasible and renewing his interest in deploying future automations.

Read More

Day 308 – Speed is The Champion

This article explores the concept that speed often leads to success in various fields, from business to technology and sports. It argues that systems capable of rapid action, feedback, and adjustment tend to outperform those focused on avoiding errors. The author highlights the importance of fast feedback loops, citing John Boyd’s OODA loop and its application in AI systems. The piece also discusses the speed-accuracy tradeoff, noting that while speed can lead to more mistakes, these are often recoverable, and the compounding effect of rapid learning ultimately drives better results.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x