The statement that people make to me that drives me the most crazy starts with, “they way it is supposed to work…”

I have discovered that most people, including myself, who say this from time to time absolutely have no idea how IT is supposed to work, whatever IT is. They just use this phrase to make themselves sound more credible. Somehow by starting my statement, the way this is supposed to work is going to convince people to accept my viewpoint. I would like to state something very clearly and unequivocally. There is no “supposed to”. There is no perfect mold for your scenario. If there was a perfect mold for our scenario then computer scientists and engineers would have already figured out how to automate what you are doing and you would be completely obsolete. That is what happens to everything that follows a predictable and repeatable pattern. So when you say it is supposed to be a certain way, what you are really saying is that you do not want to do this any more and that you would prefer that a machine do the work.

Seriously, if Einstein could basically destroy the foundations upon which Newtonian physics are based on, then there is no mold for whatever you are working on!! So stop expecting there to be a mold! In fact if someone says there is a mold for what you are doing then you have only two real choices. 1. Accept the mold and decide very quickly to move on to something else because that job task is going to be quickly commoditized. 2. Break the mold! Quickly! The faster you customize, confuse, disorient and obfuscate the process the more likely it is you will succeed!

I am human. I will never accept that I should fit anyone’s mold. I am unique. I am individual. How dare you tell me how something is supposed to work!!

Break the Mold!

Guy Ream

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 309 – The Price Tag of Automation

The author recounts his frustrating experience with home automation after Google abandoned its Nest architecture, leading him to build his own system. He highlights the significant time and effort required for maintenance and the eventual abandonment of his automation efforts due to the high ‘economic life’ cost. However, with the advent of AI, the cost and effort of automation have decreased, making it more feasible and renewing his interest in deploying future automations.

Read More

Day 308 – Speed is The Champion

This article explores the concept that speed often leads to success in various fields, from business to technology and sports. It argues that systems capable of rapid action, feedback, and adjustment tend to outperform those focused on avoiding errors. The author highlights the importance of fast feedback loops, citing John Boyd’s OODA loop and its application in AI systems. The piece also discusses the speed-accuracy tradeoff, noting that while speed can lead to more mistakes, these are often recoverable, and the compounding effect of rapid learning ultimately drives better results.

Read More

Day 307 – Iterative Could be Insufficient

This article explores the contrast between iterative and linear thinking, highlighting their respective strengths and weaknesses. It argues that while iterative thinking is beneficial in many fields, it can sometimes be an excuse for insufficient upfront planning, and proposes a hybrid approach for more robust decision-making.

Read More

Day 306 – The Zeigarnik Effect

The article explores the psychological relief gained from writing down unfinished tasks and concerns, linking it to the Zeigarnik Effect. It explains how externalizing thoughts through writing can free the mind from constantly remembering and worrying about unresolved issues, allowing for greater mental peace and the ability to conclude the day effectively.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x