The traditional view of self is that of a immortal soul that will live on after the physical being dies. This has been challenged by modern philosophy, going as far as to say, that the self is really just a collection of perceptions collected by neurons. I think this is dangerous. I am not going to argue for or against a spiritual entity that lives on past death, but I will argue that this view has been around for many thousands of years. To alter that in just a few decades could be very poisonous, and in fact, may have already had an immensely negative impact.

Beyond that basic argument, however, is a more complex view of self. That is comprised of several internal mechanisms that our own mind, body, soul considers as we develop and draws conclusions. This is a deep area of self probing and happens from active conscious thought all the way down to the molecular level. How we create our own self identity is very important to our mental health.

Lately, many have started to create some new ideas around possible inputs to our self view. One of the areas is the concept of gender. I am not going to argue for or against that as a concept, as gender identify is absolutely part of our self view. What I worry about is that the view of self is so complex, such wild area of consideration at a deeply subconscious level that I think there is one rule that we should all hold to, in an effort to remain as stable and as confident as possible.

We should never allow other people to infiltrate, manipulate, or challenge our own view of self. I daresay that any attempt to do so is maleficence at the worst level. The process of building a self view is something that takes years and years to build and even then is constantly changing. It is a highly personal matter and it is very important that that view develop independently of others. Our single biggest impact to that is our parents, then our family and then peer groups. That are times when those will influence our self view, but the moment those groups become deceitfully or deliberately involved in how we view ourselves, they are treading on thin ice.

In my life, in my company, in my society, and on the news I hear constantly people trying to influence they way that I view myself. I have made the conscious decision to tell those influencers to shut the bleep up and let me define my oneself, thank you very much.

Guy

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 310 – I Actually Love Opera

The author explores the reasons why people might hesitate to reveal certain aspects of themselves, using their love for opera as an example. They differentiate between privacy and concealment, arguing that while privacy is a healthy boundary, concealment stems from a fear of judgment and can be a burden. The piece concludes by advocating for the freedom found in being less concerned with labels and more comfortable with revealing one’s true complexity.

Read More

Day 309 – The Price Tag of Automation

The author recounts his frustrating experience with home automation after Google abandoned its Nest architecture, leading him to build his own system. He highlights the significant time and effort required for maintenance and the eventual abandonment of his automation efforts due to the high ‘economic life’ cost. However, with the advent of AI, the cost and effort of automation have decreased, making it more feasible and renewing his interest in deploying future automations.

Read More

Day 308 – Speed is The Champion

This article explores the concept that speed often leads to success in various fields, from business to technology and sports. It argues that systems capable of rapid action, feedback, and adjustment tend to outperform those focused on avoiding errors. The author highlights the importance of fast feedback loops, citing John Boyd’s OODA loop and its application in AI systems. The piece also discusses the speed-accuracy tradeoff, noting that while speed can lead to more mistakes, these are often recoverable, and the compounding effect of rapid learning ultimately drives better results.

Read More

Day 307 – Iterative Could be Insufficient

This article explores the contrast between iterative and linear thinking, highlighting their respective strengths and weaknesses. It argues that while iterative thinking is beneficial in many fields, it can sometimes be an excuse for insufficient upfront planning, and proposes a hybrid approach for more robust decision-making.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x