You must avoid the thought process that leads to the straw man. What you really need to do, and this thought is from one of Jordan Peterson’s lectures, is to invest in the thinking that builds the iron man. So you have the straw man versus the iron man.

The parable of the three little pigs comes to mind. The first two pigs frolicking about, careless and unwise do not put much thought into their plans and they build a house out of straw and twigs. The big bad wolf, huffs and puffs and blows them down. However, the wise pig builds his house out of stone and therefore is saved from the wolf. This is the same concept. Those that build the iron man are wise, those who build the straw man are stupid.

What is a straw man? It is effectively it mimicry of your enemy. You take a person that is in your life right now and you create a representation of them in your mind that is not true at all. They become the straw man, they become what represents to you as the source of your problems. You do this as a cheap way out, a non-thinking way out. We do it all the time. A person becomes our straw man. True they may be a problem to us, but more than likely we have them represent all that is ill with the world, because it is easier to blame the straw man then it is to look at our own selves.

Better is to conceive of and built the iron man. What is the type of person that it would take to built the house of stone. What would it take to resist all evil, to overcome challenges and be powerful. That is building the iron man. That is becoming what we want to become. One is blaming another for our weakness, the other is recognizing our weakness and creating a plan to become strong.

So next time you are really bothered with someone and start to fixate on them, ask yourself, are you building a straw man? When you start to do that, perhaps it is better to think of how you can build an iron man instead?

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x