The passionate parrot is a symbol of discongruent behavior that I see from time to time in myself and others. I try to avoid it, as difficult as it is. You see we are often subject to ideas. Now, ideas can be very useful things or also completely harmful things. If we are not careful, we can at times find ourselves taking an idea, accepting it without judgement and then start parroting that idea about as if it was our own. We are, at best, a mimicry of the idea and at the best a spokesperson or mouthpiece. Sometimes we can get pretty passionate about these ideas as we share them with an intense, yet fake, enthusiasm that belies the fact that the idea is not really our own.

You ever see any passionate parrots? Do you see yourself as being one from time to time? You can tell when someone is being a passionate parrot pretty easily. I think humans have this built in detection method for this. When they are speaking, or I should say, rehearsing the idea you can tell that the are not really convinced themselves. Rather they are doing what they think they are supposed to do, what they are getting paid to do, or are so immature that they cannot think for themselves.

What we all really need to do is to take and evaluate ideas. Really consider their worth, value and worthiness to be part of us. Once we accept an idea, we can internalize it and then through experimentation make the idea our very own. After we are able to gain real experience with an idea and have tested its merits in the laboratory of life, then we can have real passion. That shows up very clearly. People can tell the difference.

I always like to ask myself, am I being a passionate parrot here? Have I really internalized this idea?

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x