The 365 Commitment

The End Game

I saw a death bed scene on a show the other day. The angst and regret of the dying man was captured in a series of flashbacks ending with a final dramatic moment when the man gave his last utterance to his family as he died. How rarely this happens, but that got me to thinking about chess. Now why would I think about chess when watching a man die in a TV drama? Well, for one, I think about chess a lot. That is just one of the many things I do. Take a call, write an email, yell at someone on the phone, contemplate if I should start playing the Nimzo-Indian as black in response to d4. All in a days work. My normal mental state during the day.

I also thought about chess because there is something absolutely critical to the game that 99.99% of people do not understand. You must absolutely play the game with the end in mind. Now when playing against people that just know the rules, the game usually becomes only about tactics. You are just grabbing material, catching them off guard, tricking them and if you can think one more move in advance then you will generally win by devastating material gains. However, for anyone that can play with any level of competence, meaning that they do not make obvious mistakes, then the only way to win is to play to an end game scenario where you have an advantage that plays to your favor. It will do you no good, if you play to an ending that leads to a draw, or where you do not have enough check mating material, or your opponent has a pawn that you cannot stop from becoming a queen.

The best chess players are absolutely the best at understanding many of the end game scenarios and how to win them. Once you know these, you can then deliberately play toward them so that you can produce the end result that will lead to your success. Thus here we have life’s problem.

You must know the end game, so that when you make life’s tactical decisions, trades, exchanges and other negotiations that you are doing so with the end in mind. The reason is simple, this is the only way you can produce the result that you want.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 356 – Anger Caused by Friction

The author explores the emotion of aggravation, defining it as a low form of anger caused by friction. They propose an escalation pattern for anger, starting from friction and leading to full-blown anger. The core idea is that aggravation arises when one repeatedly spends attention on something they believe doesn’t deserve it.

Read More

Day 355 – The Canary Principle

The canary principle, originating from coal mining, involves testing changes on a small scale before full implementation. This concept applies to software development and personal life, encouraging small, reversible experiments to reduce the cost of learning when uncertainty is unavoidable.

Read More

Day 354 – Evidence of Work is Not Evidence of Learning

This article argues that AI has exposed a fundamental flaw in modern education: the substitution of “evidence of work” for “evidence of learning.” It highlights how schools have increasingly focused on quantifiable outputs like completed worksheets and assignments, which AI can now easily generate without genuine understanding. The author contends that AI’s proliferation forces education to return to its core purpose—actual teaching and fostering cognitive development—rather than merely verifying compliance.

Read More

Day 353 – les Lumières

Immanuel Kant’s 1784 essay, “What is enlightenment?” marked the end of an era, much like we might be at the cusp of a new one today. The Enlightenment, characterized by reason and a departure from superstition, was known as *les Lumières* by the French and *Aufklärung* by the Germans. We are now entering an “Age of Knowledge” where access to information is ubiquitous, shifting the focus from acquiring knowledge to exercising judgment.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x