The 365 Commitment

The End Game

I saw a death bed scene on a show the other day. The angst and regret of the dying man was captured in a series of flashbacks ending with a final dramatic moment when the man gave his last utterance to his family as he died. How rarely this happens, but that got me to thinking about chess. Now why would I think about chess when watching a man die in a TV drama? Well, for one, I think about chess a lot. That is just one of the many things I do. Take a call, write an email, yell at someone on the phone, contemplate if I should start playing the Nimzo-Indian as black in response to d4. All in a days work. My normal mental state during the day.

I also thought about chess because there is something absolutely critical to the game that 99.99% of people do not understand. You must absolutely play the game with the end in mind. Now when playing against people that just know the rules, the game usually becomes only about tactics. You are just grabbing material, catching them off guard, tricking them and if you can think one more move in advance then you will generally win by devastating material gains. However, for anyone that can play with any level of competence, meaning that they do not make obvious mistakes, then the only way to win is to play to an end game scenario where you have an advantage that plays to your favor. It will do you no good, if you play to an ending that leads to a draw, or where you do not have enough check mating material, or your opponent has a pawn that you cannot stop from becoming a queen.

The best chess players are absolutely the best at understanding many of the end game scenarios and how to win them. Once you know these, you can then deliberately play toward them so that you can produce the end result that will lead to your success. Thus here we have life’s problem.

You must know the end game, so that when you make life’s tactical decisions, trades, exchanges and other negotiations that you are doing so with the end in mind. The reason is simple, this is the only way you can produce the result that you want.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 331 – Are You in Control?

Humans have a unique ability to cope with uncertainty by creating an illusion of control, often attributing cause and effect to unrelated actions. This phenomenon, explored through examples like superstitions and personal anecdotes, suggests that while we may not have complete control over our environments, our brains are wired to find patterns and connections, even if they are not always accurate. This ability to fool ourselves into believing we have more control than we do can be beneficial, but it’s important to differentiate between actual impact and coincidental association.

Read More

Day 330 – Cognitive Magic Pills

The article discusses the phenomenon of “cognitive magic pills,” which are alluring solutions to problems often peddled on social media. It uses the example of cortisol being rebranded as the “stress hormone” to illustrate how these concepts gain credibility and lead people to believe in quick fixes for complex issues. The author encourages readers to be critical of such trends and to focus on understanding their own bodies and minds rather than seeking easy solutions.

Read More

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x