So yesterday I went to my daughter Belle’s piano recital. She got called up right away, so after enjoying her amazing performance we did the polite thing and waited through the rest of the performances. One of the young men that plays chess at my club in town, got up to play. He went through one song, that seems a decent enough job. Then he finished by playing the second movement of Beethoven’s Sonata #8, Sonata Pathétique. 

Beethoven finished this work for the piano during the tail end of what is called his “early period” when he was 27 years old. I am a Mozart fan personally, and so was Beethoven. In fact as a child he almost got accepted as a student of Mozart, but his mother’s illness prevented him from staying in Vienna. Many have compared this famous sonata with Mozart’s great work, Sonata #14. In fact, a great meditative exercise would be to shut yourself into a dark room with no other sound and play these two sonatas back to back and listen to them, really listen. You can decide for yourself.

Mozart’s is precisely done, nearly perfect, light and made for a great and capable piano artist. Beethoven’s is a good work as well, but it a bit chaotic, surprising and strangely emotional. Mozarts will leave you feeling uplifted and inspired, but Beethoven’s might make you look to the heavens and weep.

Anyway this young man played well, a few people wiped tears from their eyes. The way the music modulates between minor and major chords is nothing less than miraculous. It lifts the soul, and in some strange way pulls at you in a way that cannot be described. It feels like a complete statement, rounded out in some profound way. If you have ever heard someone say that music has a voice or speaks to you, then this is the composition to listen to.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Misty
Misty
4 years ago

Amen!

Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x