According to psychology researcher, Ben Vermaercke, rats can actually be superior to us humans on a cognitive level. The reason according to many repeated studies of performing the same tasks between Rats and Humans is due to shortcuts that humans take. We do this because of the complexity of our thought process. We look for rules to define and discriminate our universe of decisions so that we can be much more efficient. Leaves of three, let them be. We setup rules to avoid or select based on already understood experience.

Now rats have similar brain pattern and function as humans. They have multiple patterns of speech and complicated communication systems. They are very in tune with their environment, despite being labeled as blind all the time. They are able to process and synthesize multiple inputs into a common, and even shared interpretation. They have even demonstrated some rudimentary use of tools and other mechanism to gain their desired result.

In the studies, rats perform equally well as humans on simple pattern recognition exercises. When they learn a pattern, they can quickly and easily apply that pattern again to get the same result. They have an ability to apply a pattern of known good items to a new set of items that exhibit similar equalities. When the tests make this more complicated by adding in new dimensions or variables, the rats tend to outperform humans. Why? Humans make it too complicated. The rat goes after the goal, through the least effort possible and uses the pattern recognition across multiple dimensions. Humans can do this as well, but when new conditions are introduced they slow down, whereas the rat does not.

Effectively, humans over think it. Rats know what works and just do that regardless of what else is going on unless they are absolutely forced to change their approach. So sometimes, especially on important things, we should think like a Rat.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 354 – Evidence of Work is Not Evidence of Learning

This article argues that AI has exposed a fundamental flaw in modern education: the substitution of “evidence of work” for “evidence of learning.” It highlights how schools have increasingly focused on quantifiable outputs like completed worksheets and assignments, which AI can now easily generate without genuine understanding. The author contends that AI’s proliferation forces education to return to its core purpose—actual teaching and fostering cognitive development—rather than merely verifying compliance.

Read More

Day 353 – les Lumières

Immanuel Kant’s 1784 essay, “What is enlightenment?” marked the end of an era, much like we might be at the cusp of a new one today. The Enlightenment, characterized by reason and a departure from superstition, was known as *les Lumières* by the French and *Aufklärung* by the Germans. We are now entering an “Age of Knowledge” where access to information is ubiquitous, shifting the focus from acquiring knowledge to exercising judgment.

Read More

Day 352 – Habits are Foundation

This article discusses the importance of developing habits for personal transformation. It emphasizes that consistent, small habits lead to inevitable success and reduce reliance on motivation or discipline. The key is to engage in the principal action related to your desired outcome every day, as repetition is the best way to fix behavior.

Read More

Day 351 – The Real Risk is Not the Start

Many people fear starting new initiatives due to the perceived risk of initial failure. However, the beginning often offers easy gains and quick successes. The real challenge arises after these initial successes, when progress plateaus and requires significantly more effort, skill, or a change in strategy.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x