According to psychology researcher, Ben Vermaercke, rats can actually be superior to us humans on a cognitive level. The reason according to many repeated studies of performing the same tasks between Rats and Humans is due to shortcuts that humans take. We do this because of the complexity of our thought process. We look for rules to define and discriminate our universe of decisions so that we can be much more efficient. Leaves of three, let them be. We setup rules to avoid or select based on already understood experience.

Now rats have similar brain pattern and function as humans. They have multiple patterns of speech and complicated communication systems. They are very in tune with their environment, despite being labeled as blind all the time. They are able to process and synthesize multiple inputs into a common, and even shared interpretation. They have even demonstrated some rudimentary use of tools and other mechanism to gain their desired result.

In the studies, rats perform equally well as humans on simple pattern recognition exercises. When they learn a pattern, they can quickly and easily apply that pattern again to get the same result. They have an ability to apply a pattern of known good items to a new set of items that exhibit similar equalities. When the tests make this more complicated by adding in new dimensions or variables, the rats tend to outperform humans. Why? Humans make it too complicated. The rat goes after the goal, through the least effort possible and uses the pattern recognition across multiple dimensions. Humans can do this as well, but when new conditions are introduced they slow down, whereas the rat does not.

Effectively, humans over think it. Rats know what works and just do that regardless of what else is going on unless they are absolutely forced to change their approach. So sometimes, especially on important things, we should think like a Rat.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 324 – Guilt Requires Action

This article explores the pervasive human experience of guilt, drawing parallels between psychological insights, religious practices, and anecdotal evidence. It highlights the importance of taking action—whether through restitution, apology, or confession—to alleviate the burden of guilt, citing examples like visitors returning stolen items to Petrified Forest National Park and personal reflections on unresolved past actions.

Read More

Day 323 – The Great Flattening

The widespread use of AI writing assistants is leading to a concerning ‘voice flattening’ in personal identity, as AI-assisted rewriting reduces linguistic diversity. This can make our words and thinking generic, blurring the essence of our personal identity. The author recommends using AI deliberately to maintain one’s unique voice.

Read More

Day 322 – Change Your Bubble

The author describes how social media algorithms create ‘bubbles’ based on user preferences and engagement. They challenge readers to deliberately change the signals they feed to these platforms to alter their online experience. The author shares a personal experiment of immersing themselves in baseball content to escape the political bubble and observe the impact on their feeds and perception of the world.

Read More

Day 321 – No Drilling Through Bulkheads

This article introduces the “Watertight Ship Principle,” advocating for strict adherence to boundaries within systems to prevent future complications. It uses examples from laundry, corporate finances, and even an ant infestation to illustrate how small exceptions or shortcuts can lead to significant problems, especially in the age of AI where systems can be built rapidly.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x