So if you have studied quantum physics at all, you will know of this this concept called Schrödinger’s Cat. It is a scenario to describe how a quantum system remains in superposition until it is actually observed. In this example, there was this hypothetical experiment in which the outcome could be that the cat lives or dies. When unobserved the cat could be alive or dead, but when someone looks into the box, that cat will be in one of those two states. This is a fun area to read up on. It is quite incredible actually to contemplate the infinite.

The reason I bring this up is that my daily routine is a similar conundrum as illustrated by this cat experiment. I can produce many different results, all in superposition. My day, when it starts, can have a wide range of possibilities. However, it is my observation, my action, my purpose that will cause that result to occur. This is the Quantum view of my day. If I were to magnify my life out to the maximum degree, or view my lifespan as infinite or immortal, then my one day would seem trivial and insignificant.  However, is it? If I look at one day in time and capture that day then it could be the instance that proves the result.

This is why I must wake up everyday with this attitude. Today I can choose the result by deliberate action on today’s challenges. Very quantum thinking, the version of Guy today, on this one microscopic day, will cause a chain of events that leads to another possibility. Each day producing a new branch, a better branch of the infinite life of Guy.

Guy Reams

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x