The Ought and the Should

Early this morning, I read an research paper published by Tony Higgins in 1987.  This paper was on “self-discrepancy.” Essentially, he proposed that humans have three basic views of themselves. The view of who they actually are, the view of who they “ought” to be and the view of who they ideally “should” be.  If there really is three distinct categories is up to some debate, but the concept is interesting to explore.

I think everyone does have a real sense of who they actually are. They may not admit that to others, but they probably really do understand who they actually are. They may not want to admit it, or try to hide it, but generally we know who we are. What is complicated is that gets confused often by who we think we “ought” to be and who we “should” be. This is where we produce feelings of anxiety and discouragement.

What was interesting about this research is that there was a clear distinction on what are of our view of self generates specific feelings. It seems rather obvious, but Social Anxiety is usually created from the view of who we “ought” to be. We have a view of what is expected of us by others. That is what creates the most anxiety. When we feel discouragement that leads to depression. This research indicates that occurs mostly when we have a discrepancy between who we actually are and who we feel we “should” be.

This research, and most research in this same area, always has similar conclusions. This is probably the key takeaway. If you want to reduce feelings of anxiety and depression then you need to bring your view of what you “ought” and “should” closer to who you actually are. That can be done in two major ways. First – by actually improving yourself. That is a big one. The second is to change what you view you “ought” or “should” be. That is actually harder, because it is not always in your control.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 309 – The Price Tag of Automation

The author recounts his frustrating experience with home automation after Google abandoned its Nest architecture, leading him to build his own system. He highlights the significant time and effort required for maintenance and the eventual abandonment of his automation efforts due to the high ‘economic life’ cost. However, with the advent of AI, the cost and effort of automation have decreased, making it more feasible and renewing his interest in deploying future automations.

Read More

Day 308 – Speed is The Champion

This article explores the concept that speed often leads to success in various fields, from business to technology and sports. It argues that systems capable of rapid action, feedback, and adjustment tend to outperform those focused on avoiding errors. The author highlights the importance of fast feedback loops, citing John Boyd’s OODA loop and its application in AI systems. The piece also discusses the speed-accuracy tradeoff, noting that while speed can lead to more mistakes, these are often recoverable, and the compounding effect of rapid learning ultimately drives better results.

Read More

Day 307 – Iterative Could be Insufficient

This article explores the contrast between iterative and linear thinking, highlighting their respective strengths and weaknesses. It argues that while iterative thinking is beneficial in many fields, it can sometimes be an excuse for insufficient upfront planning, and proposes a hybrid approach for more robust decision-making.

Read More

Day 306 – The Zeigarnik Effect

The article explores the psychological relief gained from writing down unfinished tasks and concerns, linking it to the Zeigarnik Effect. It explains how externalizing thoughts through writing can free the mind from constantly remembering and worrying about unresolved issues, allowing for greater mental peace and the ability to conclude the day effectively.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x