The traditional view of self is that of a immortal soul that will live on after the physical being dies. This has been challenged by modern philosophy, going as far as to say, that the self is really just a collection of perceptions collected by neurons. I think this is dangerous. I am not going to argue for or against a spiritual entity that lives on past death, but I will argue that this view has been around for many thousands of years. To alter that in just a few decades could be very poisonous, and in fact, may have already had an immensely negative impact.

Beyond that basic argument, however, is a more complex view of self. That is comprised of several internal mechanisms that our own mind, body, soul considers as we develop and draws conclusions. This is a deep area of self probing and happens from active conscious thought all the way down to the molecular level. How we create our own self identity is very important to our mental health.

Lately, many have started to create some new ideas around possible inputs to our self view. One of the areas is the concept of gender. I am not going to argue for or against that as a concept, as gender identify is absolutely part of our self view. What I worry about is that the view of self is so complex, such wild area of consideration at a deeply subconscious level that I think there is one rule that we should all hold to, in an effort to remain as stable and as confident as possible.

We should never allow other people to infiltrate, manipulate, or challenge our own view of self. I daresay that any attempt to do so is maleficence at the worst level. The process of building a self view is something that takes years and years to build and even then is constantly changing. It is a highly personal matter and it is very important that that view develop independently of others. Our single biggest impact to that is our parents, then our family and then peer groups. That are times when those will influence our self view, but the moment those groups become deceitfully or deliberately involved in how we view ourselves, they are treading on thin ice.

In my life, in my company, in my society, and on the news I hear constantly people trying to influence they way that I view myself. I have made the conscious decision to tell those influencers to shut the bleep up and let me define my oneself, thank you very much.

Guy

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 330 – Cognitive Magic Pills

The article discusses the phenomenon of “cognitive magic pills,” which are alluring solutions to problems often peddled on social media. It uses the example of cortisol being rebranded as the “stress hormone” to illustrate how these concepts gain credibility and lead people to believe in quick fixes for complex issues. The author encourages readers to be critical of such trends and to focus on understanding their own bodies and minds rather than seeking easy solutions.

Read More

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x