Interesting enough I have through the process of elimination figured out that the body needs approximately 100 calories per hour to function on a basic level. I learned that during a running event, I need to consume a certain amount of calories per hour and if I do not do so, fatigue sets in really quickly. Taking the same basic concept, I have been playing round with how many calories do I have to consume in order to carry on basic functions while sitting at a desk and doing nothing but typing.

Now, I could go with nothing. You can probably survive for 30 days or more without eating. However, there is a point where the body starts consuming all remaining blood sugar in the blood stream and starts to look for other sources. It starts to rob glucose from the muscle tissues and when that goes out, will eventually turn to mostly fat consumption. I started to try to figure out when the switch happens. When does the body no longer have a readily available glucose or protein stream coming from digestion and needs to start scrounging around for sources of energy? Not sure the exact timing, but I know what it feels like.

So after awhile, I started to notice that it would drain out, I would get that feeling. Then I would eat a 100 calorie snack and sure enough, that feeling would come back after about an hour. So basic function is 100 calories per hour and if you go for 3 hours between food sources, you would need about 300 calories at various intervals throughout the day. Using this information, I started to look at what I normally consume. In some cases, 1200 calories is quite possible for main meals. That is way over consumption.

What is interesting if you could actually see what your body consumed versus what it did not, you would be amazed out how little you actually need to function. Amazing really, how incredibly efficient the human body is.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x