Perplexing thought hit me yesterday. Trying to play minecraft with my daughter. I was not good at playing video games as a child, and nothing has really changed much.

If you have never experienced Minecraft, there is one thing you will find interesting. You can play in a mincraft world, which is generated completely randomly and can be adjusted to be even more variable with a string of digits called a seed code. This creates a minecraft world divided by a series of biomes. Each biome is constructed with chunk and the basic unit of a chunk is called a block. A block is quite literally that, a square block.

What is really interesting is that there are some areas of this world that get randomly generated with these blocks that are quite beautiful. Cascading water falls, giant arches, caves, flowers, trees, and a blending of magnificent landscapes. A few kids run around attacking zombies or each other, but many use the building blocks of this world to create their own ideas.

The point is that beauty is created by a completely random sequence. In life people will look at something beautiful and use that as an argument for a creator, or God. This random generation in Minecraft demonstrates that beauty can be created with completely random artificial construction. Does that disprove there is a God?

Well, perhaps. However, consider this. The basic construction of a minecraft world requires these blocks that have properties and follow certain rules in the environment. Those rules and properties were created and applied to blocks by programmers, or sentient intelligence.

So that is interesting. The beauty was created by a random act, but the beauty would never be possible without the intelligent design behind the construct.

Guy

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 330 – Cognitive Magic Pills

The article discusses the phenomenon of “cognitive magic pills,” which are alluring solutions to problems often peddled on social media. It uses the example of cortisol being rebranded as the “stress hormone” to illustrate how these concepts gain credibility and lead people to believe in quick fixes for complex issues. The author encourages readers to be critical of such trends and to focus on understanding their own bodies and minds rather than seeking easy solutions.

Read More

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x