Most people raised in one of the major religious traditions will tend to view selflessness as the ideal to strive for. The thought of focusing on your own happiness is something that you can pursue, but better would be to sacrifice your own needs for that of others. I suppose that I subscribe to that mentality. However, pause for a moment and consider that perhaps selflessness is actually one of major problems in our society today. The pressure to remove the value of the individual and to embrace group think, probably escalated by social media, has caused a lack of self worth, individual identity and even pursuit of merit, for merit alone. The feeling of pride and accomplishment of producing something great rather then just being something because you belong to something.

Rugged individualism was value taken for granted in the United States. An ideal that everyone seemed to gravitate towards. James Dean, Marlon Brando, Clint Eastwood. The underlying desire to put self aside fuels a feeling that the considerations of group think are good, because the objective is always painted as altruistic and doing something to help one group or another. We are painted as members, non members, allies and enemies. No one is going to argue the need to think past your own needs and consider the needs of others, especially a group deemed worthy. However, perhaps we should take a step back and ask ourselves, what is really wrong with selfishness?

If everyone was truly selfish, truly seeking only their own happiness as their objective, then what would society really be like? People think it would be chaos, anarchy, mayhem around every corner. However, would it? Overtime, people would reach the inevitable conclusion that hurting others in any deliberate way will produce disastrous results for your individual happiness. However, you would learn overtime, that personal achievement, a standard of morality, and above all the need to produce something of value. In a world of individuals all achieving the best they can, they are only going to connect with, share relationships with and trade with those that have something meaningful to provide them. Independent, free thinking, rational people all trying to build value is what selfishness would produce.

The is the anti-relativist concept. Anti-post modern. What Ayn Rand would call objectivist. Whatever you call it, individualism is actually less full fo conflict then the very nature of group think, which is absolutely predicated upon conflict. US versus THEM. I think I will stay selfish thank you very much. More me against me. I chose not to join your group, I will just be me and the best me that I can come up with.

Guy

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 330 – Cognitive Magic Pills

The article discusses the phenomenon of “cognitive magic pills,” which are alluring solutions to problems often peddled on social media. It uses the example of cortisol being rebranded as the “stress hormone” to illustrate how these concepts gain credibility and lead people to believe in quick fixes for complex issues. The author encourages readers to be critical of such trends and to focus on understanding their own bodies and minds rather than seeking easy solutions.

Read More

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x