It is a good idea to have boundaries. How much are you willing to give? How much are you willing to allow? When someone is pushing you for an emotional response, how much is too much? I have been pondering this a lot lately, as I am on the hunt for things in my life that prevent, delay or hurt my ability to achieve my goals in life.

First up, boundaries are good. I should not feel guilty or bad about having boundaries with people. It is ok for me to say that certain topics are off limits, or that I just will not discuss them or perhaps only discuss them up to a point, and I can define what that point is. This is ok, and perfectly acceptable. No one should feel guilty about this. Here is why. You are not super human, the emotional reaction you get from certain people, and/or certain topics can and will completely derail your forward progress. You could be doing great when all of a sudden, you are caught in the cross hairs of a person who knows the buttons to push that completely set you off. There you are, your whole day ruined and all progress stymied because you let that person drag you into a conversation. For this reason boundaries are good.

Here is the problem, however, how do you enforce the boundary? I, in my passive aggressive nature, will avoid conflict instead of dealing with it. I will choose to set a boundary and then not let the other people know about it. I think this is good, because I do not want to have a conflict about it. Consequently the other party has no idea that I have set this boundary and they either think that I am avoiding them or that something is seriously wrong with me. Which causes them to probe even more and then I am in full time avoidance mode. So this always backfires.

I think the better is just simply telling people no. Then in a very clear and distinct way inform the person that you have established a boundary, that you have the right to do so, and that you are not going to allow that boundary to be crossed. I am ok with talking to you about all these things, but that particular topic we are just not going to discuss. This way, the boundary is clear. If they choose to violate that boundary, then you can walk away with a clean and guilt free conscious. No more avoiding required. I have also learned that taking the blame is the best approach. Sort of like this, I am sorry but I am unable to discuss that topic with you. I have a challenge, that causes me to get side tracked when I get to emotionally involved with that topic, so I am just not going to go there with you. Understand? This changes the game. You are admitting weakness, but with a very firm and solid No. This give you power, yet at the same time exposing weakness. It is a great way to disarm a potential adversary.

I think it is a clear sign of mental health to be able to clearly identify trigger points, setup very clear boundaries and then be able to articulate that to others. If you are able to do this, you are more likely to keep your commitments to yourself. Lets face it, an emotionally charged situation does have a physical effect on you.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 357 – Curiosity is Cheap

This article explores the challenges introverts face with draining conversations and offers a solution: embracing curiosity. By shifting from feeling the need to “perform” in conversations to simply being curious and asking questions, the perceived energy cost of interactions can be significantly reduced, fostering better relationships.

Read More

Day 356 – Anger Caused by Friction

The author explores the emotion of aggravation, defining it as a low form of anger caused by friction. They propose an escalation pattern for anger, starting from friction and leading to full-blown anger. The core idea is that aggravation arises when one repeatedly spends attention on something they believe doesn’t deserve it.

Read More

Day 355 – The Canary Principle

The canary principle, originating from coal mining, involves testing changes on a small scale before full implementation. This concept applies to software development and personal life, encouraging small, reversible experiments to reduce the cost of learning when uncertainty is unavoidable.

Read More

Day 354 – Evidence of Work is Not Evidence of Learning

This article argues that AI has exposed a fundamental flaw in modern education: the substitution of “evidence of work” for “evidence of learning.” It highlights how schools have increasingly focused on quantifiable outputs like completed worksheets and assignments, which AI can now easily generate without genuine understanding. The author contends that AI’s proliferation forces education to return to its core purpose—actual teaching and fostering cognitive development—rather than merely verifying compliance.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x