When I was younger, I took several courses in systems design. I heard a lecture, and I do not remember the source, in which the speaker emphatically said that if you want to change the output, then you need to control the inputs. In his view, systems were based on this simple concept. There was this black box of hidden mystery, which was the system itself. The user  and consumer populations did not need to know about the interior of the black box. Rather the greatest impact to those populations would be what the required to input versus what was output. Focus on the streams. This is an older way to view systems, because back in the early days of computing, this was effectively true. You input data, you got a result back. Systems have got much more complicated since then and the interplay between subsystems has certainly made this a less applicable model.

However, there is still some truth to the concept. Nowadays we use different metaphors to create models for how systems function, but the black box concept is interesting and surprisingly powerful. Imagine if you will that your mind, body, and everything else going on with you is a black box as well. Imagine that you are no longer in that black box, but rather a remote observer of your own system. What would you have available to analyze? You would have the inputs and outputs. You could see what was going into “you” and what was going out of “you.” Now from a food consumption perspective, this would be a rather disgusting interpretation of the black box theory. However, it would still apply. If you want to know what is wrong with your nutritional “system” then take a look at the inputs. What result does the input produce? If you do not like the result, then the only thing you really have control over is to change the inputs. So extend that to your entire life. What is going into your black box? This mysterious thing called you.

Can you take a dispassionate view of yourself as a ‘black box’?

What are your inputs? Can you identify them? Who and what is providing input into your system? If you could look at yourself from afar, could you actually view this stream of input (data) flowing into you from large corporate entities? Netflix, Disney, Comcast, Newscorp? Would you see how the information they control flow into you? Would you see the influence certain people have on you? Family, Friends, Work Colleagues, Congregations, and other People? Who is providing you input? Where is it coming from? Back to the black box theory. If you want to control the outcome, you have to control the inputs. We can have the greatest intentions in the world, but when you have a constant flow of bad intentions flowing into you, even the strongest minds will fail. Perhaps you should consider stemming the flow of nonsense, or perhaps even influence trying to manipulate you to buy, consume or believe a certain way.

Anyway, not sure if the black box theory is relevant to modern systems design, but I think it absolutely can help us see the truth of our own situation. If we have no control over the inputs in our life, then we will no control over the outcome.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 350 – Learning to Triangulate

The article explains the concept of triangulation, drawing parallels between its use in surveying and navigation to its application in evaluating information. It emphasizes the importance of cross-referencing multiple independent sources to determine truth, especially in an age of misinformation and AI-generated content. The author argues that accepting information at face value is no longer viable and that triangulation should become a default reaction.

Read More

Day 349 – The Practice of Conceptual Decomposition

This article explores the author’s accidental discovery of conceptual decomposition as a superpower. Initially used to overcome learning difficulties, this method of breaking down complex systems into understandable parts proved invaluable in their career, particularly in teaching and computer science. The author advocates for applying this technique when interacting with AI to achieve more accurate and reliable results.

Read More

Day 348 – First Things First

The author shares their experience of maintaining seven daily habits for over 3,181 days, emphasizing the importance of doing crucial tasks first thing in the morning. They advise tackling life-changing habits immediately upon waking to avoid procrastination and increase the likelihood of completion, drawing on personal examples like early morning runs.

Read More

Day 347 – What is ‘having faith?’

A spiritual leader’s daily ritual of questioning his beliefs profoundly impacted the author, leading to a decades-long quest to understand the true meaning of faith. The author concludes that faith is not mere belief, but rather an active pursuit in the absence of proof, contrasting it with complacency that can arise from dormant beliefs.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x