Reading more psychology research earlier this morning, an article by a cognitive behaviorist named Janet Gibson. She has done some research on the development of a sense of humour. Early psychologists felt that laughing, telling jokes, or acting out were examples of us hiding something or concealing our true intent. However, this does not ring true to me, and also to modern psychologists.

You see understanding and then finding humor in a joke is actually a sign of a intellectual grasp of a rather complicated view of the world. This helps me feel better. One of my travelling companions is my 10 year old daughter, and she has two modes. Laughing and joking is the main mode. The other is mad because she can’t do whatever she wants. She jokes around about just about anything, especially anything with the slightest hint of irony. So I am glad that moden science gives that a thumbs-up in terms of advanced cognitive ability. Gives me some hope.

Think about what you have to do in order to find something funny. You have to first, suspend reality and imagine in your mind the scenario being described. Then actually detect something is amiss, and usually in multiple scenarios. Finally, you have to determine how to resolve the issue, eliminate non humorous alternatives and focus on the one that is funny.

Last you actually have to experience the emotion of discovery, elation, and then laughter. Quite complex this process of hearing a joke and finding the humor in it!

So bottom line. Laugh more, tell more jokes. It relieves anxiety and helps us get through tough times.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x