Ok gringos, the phrase is not mono e mono, it is actually mano a mano. Somebody back in time one day heard this said in Spanish, got it all wrong and forever ingrained in our culture is the wrong phrase. Lets also clear up another issue on this phrase. Mano is not man. This is not a reference to man to man combat, but rather hand to hand combat. So next time you are ready to go to battle with someone, please recognize when you say, ‘you ready to go mono e mono’, what you are really asking is to go monkey to monkey – which maybe more accurate of a query. Say it right, ‘mano a mano’ and then put up your bare knuckles, because that is what you are inviting them to.

Having said that, sometimes, you just need to go mano a mano with someone. In a figurative sense of course. All though there have certainly been a few times where I felt like a good punch in the face would do someone good. Dancing around the subject of difficult human interaction is exhausting. People do not say what they mean, or articulate what they feel. They just dance around the subject, like two monkeys (mono e mono). This is just a giant time suck, so perhaps it is better to just to have it out. Get it over with.

Since when did getting into an argument turn into a bad thing anyway? Are we so trapped behind anonymity on the Internet that we just cannot handle a intense conversation now and then? We have become so wimpy nowadays, we waste so much time fumbling around and trying to avoid conflict. Whenever I do get into a fight with another, there are usually a few outcomes.

I feel bad at first, but the relationship with person improves. We now know our differences and understand where we come from. The next conversation is definitely more efficient.

I am no longer avoiding things. A quick call, a quick note and I have already exposed my intent with the person. We both know exactly where each other is coming from.

Overtime we actually become allies, because we have done what is required to build relationships. We have gone mano a mano, we understand each other. Our relationship produces faster results, so now when I need something I can go straight to that person. I know what they are good at and what they want, so they are the most likely to help.

So, stop going mono e mono with people, start going mano a mano and improve your relationships!

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wayne White
Wayne White
1 year ago

Absolutely beautifully said. Could not have put it any better and I’m doing a lot of that recently. I am writing a book a poems with little stories in between that are absolutely gorgeous. If you would like a sample and or a copy of the book when it comes out, just text me and let me know. Thank you for the aforesaid.🙏🏼

Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 330 – Cognitive Magic Pills

The article discusses the phenomenon of “cognitive magic pills,” which are alluring solutions to problems often peddled on social media. It uses the example of cortisol being rebranded as the “stress hormone” to illustrate how these concepts gain credibility and lead people to believe in quick fixes for complex issues. The author encourages readers to be critical of such trends and to focus on understanding their own bodies and minds rather than seeking easy solutions.

Read More

Day 329 – Art is Capturing the Form

The author explores the concept of art through the lens of form and function, using two tape measures as an analogy. They then delve into Charles Ross’s Star Axis project, which aims to capture the journey of the North Star, suggesting it as a powerful example of art capturing form and connecting humanity across time.

Read More

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x