Nature seems to get this pairs thing. Everywhere you look, things are in pairs. That natural symbiotic relationship between genders but also jus the idea that things work together. Rarely do you find a species, although there are some, where there is not a natural pairing that goes on. This sort of makes you wonder why this is the case? I am sure there are some great theories, but I being of a more practical mind really do not care all that much. The point is that things just work better in pairs, when two people are gathered together in common purpose, the result is always better. This is primarily because one can pick the other up, or help out when the other is struggling. Two minds are definitely better than one, as they temper each other and help to cause motivation and help encourage each other. I daresay, that most of the great ideas, great companies in our history have started with a tandem. I could go through them all with you, but you know the names, Carnegie/Schwab, Hewlett/Packard, Jobs/Woz and Gates/Allen. Probably hundreds more.

Since working with someone seems to be a natural law, then maybe this is a key ingredient to success? I have seen so many great relationship and great success with people that have chosen to partner together in a common cause. My life experience has proven this to be the case as well, so perhaps we should just default to this motion? A party of one is just that, but a party of two starts the tribe, so if this works then why not? So as I consider all of my self improvement objectives, perhaps I need to consider who my “buddy” is on each one of them?

Also, as we think about human behavior and how to help others, like perhaps with a team at work, or students in a classroom. If the natural law is that people work better in pairs, then why do we focus so much on individual effort. Perhaps we should really consider making assignments out to two people together rather than one.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 309 – The Price Tag of Automation

The author recounts his frustrating experience with home automation after Google abandoned its Nest architecture, leading him to build his own system. He highlights the significant time and effort required for maintenance and the eventual abandonment of his automation efforts due to the high ‘economic life’ cost. However, with the advent of AI, the cost and effort of automation have decreased, making it more feasible and renewing his interest in deploying future automations.

Read More

Day 308 – Speed is The Champion

This article explores the concept that speed often leads to success in various fields, from business to technology and sports. It argues that systems capable of rapid action, feedback, and adjustment tend to outperform those focused on avoiding errors. The author highlights the importance of fast feedback loops, citing John Boyd’s OODA loop and its application in AI systems. The piece also discusses the speed-accuracy tradeoff, noting that while speed can lead to more mistakes, these are often recoverable, and the compounding effect of rapid learning ultimately drives better results.

Read More

Day 307 – Iterative Could be Insufficient

This article explores the contrast between iterative and linear thinking, highlighting their respective strengths and weaknesses. It argues that while iterative thinking is beneficial in many fields, it can sometimes be an excuse for insufficient upfront planning, and proposes a hybrid approach for more robust decision-making.

Read More

Day 306 – The Zeigarnik Effect

The article explores the psychological relief gained from writing down unfinished tasks and concerns, linking it to the Zeigarnik Effect. It explains how externalizing thoughts through writing can free the mind from constantly remembering and worrying about unresolved issues, allowing for greater mental peace and the ability to conclude the day effectively.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x