Nature seems to get this pairs thing. Everywhere you look, things are in pairs. That natural symbiotic relationship between genders but also jus the idea that things work together. Rarely do you find a species, although there are some, where there is not a natural pairing that goes on. This sort of makes you wonder why this is the case? I am sure there are some great theories, but I being of a more practical mind really do not care all that much. The point is that things just work better in pairs, when two people are gathered together in common purpose, the result is always better. This is primarily because one can pick the other up, or help out when the other is struggling. Two minds are definitely better than one, as they temper each other and help to cause motivation and help encourage each other. I daresay, that most of the great ideas, great companies in our history have started with a tandem. I could go through them all with you, but you know the names, Carnegie/Schwab, Hewlett/Packard, Jobs/Woz and Gates/Allen. Probably hundreds more.

Since working with someone seems to be a natural law, then maybe this is a key ingredient to success? I have seen so many great relationship and great success with people that have chosen to partner together in a common cause. My life experience has proven this to be the case as well, so perhaps we should just default to this motion? A party of one is just that, but a party of two starts the tribe, so if this works then why not? So as I consider all of my self improvement objectives, perhaps I need to consider who my “buddy” is on each one of them?

Also, as we think about human behavior and how to help others, like perhaps with a team at work, or students in a classroom. If the natural law is that people work better in pairs, then why do we focus so much on individual effort. Perhaps we should really consider making assignments out to two people together rather than one.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 282 – Building Requires a Plan

This article uses the unique example of Bishop Castle to illustrate the critical difference between persistence and purposeful planning. While admirable, persistence alone doesn’t guarantee a useful or sustainable outcome; effort needs direction to build something intentional and lasting.

Read More

Day 281 – Rebuild without Becoming Bitter

This article explores the resilience of the Acadian and Cajun people, who, despite immense loss and displacement, refused to lose their identity. It highlights their ability to rebuild without bitterness, adapt to new influences, and maintain their culture, offering a powerful lesson for anyone facing personal loss.

Read More

Day 280 – The Impatience Trap

This article explores how impatience can masquerade as productivity, leading to switching tools prematurely rather than investing the time to learn and master a single one. It highlights the importance of distinguishing between genuine progress and the false promise of novelty when facing frustration.

Read More

Day 279 – Effects of Artificial Stress

After a challenging week backpacking in the wilderness, the author found their sleep quality dramatically improved compared to their restless nights at home. This experience highlighted the difference between ‘real’ stress encountered in nature and the constant ‘artificial’ stress from digital demands, suggesting that true rest may depend on the absence of these pervasive digital pokes at our nervous system.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x