Experience is the best teacher. This is a trite phrase or axiom that we all subscribe to. So why do we try to stop people that are about ready to learn by experience that something is just not going to work out for them? When you have wisdom gained by experience it is very easy to reach your hand out and try to stop someone from making a mistake that you yourself made many times. However, when you do so, what have you accomplished really?

Most of the times you make an enemy, or create enmity between you and the person that you are trying to stop from making a mistake. If the mistake is not life threatening, then perhaps the best course of action is not to interrupt. After all, when some wise person tried to stop you, did you? No, you got mad at them and did what you were intending to do anyway.

A more important consideration. If someone is adversarial to you, or working against your purposes then by no means should you interrupt the course they are on. If you really believe that your course is correct, then you should absolutely let the other party proceed with their plan because it will fail. That is the strongest and most convincing argument that your path is correct, is when the alternative paths fail. As the Art of War says, never interrupt your enemy while they are making a mistake. Go ahead and let them happily plunge off the proverbial cliff.

Patience to see your plan through, and all other people’s plans to take their natural course is perhaps one of the most difficult things to do. However, it is absolutely wise and saves you a ton of stress. You are not going to be able to convince people they are wrong, for the same reasons they will not convince you that you are wrong, so just let it happen. Do not interrupt the greatest teacher working her magic. Let experience do her thing.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x