The 365 Commitment

You Are Your Best Moves

This is the theme of the FIDE World Championship Chess Match this year. For those of you that are sleeping in on this fine Saturday morning, Magnus Carlsen and Ian Nepomniachtchi just drew their 7th game of their 14 game match. The game drew on repetitious moves, which Magnus claimed after move 41. However that is not the story, the news flash is that these two woke up to play this morning in Dubai after a record 8+ hour game. Effectively, Magnus gained an advantage in pawns, and traded off his queen for compensation of these pawns and used that to slowly pressure a win. Magnus is a 2855 rated chess player. To put that in perspective, some of the great names that you might of heard of in the past did not have ratings that high even at their highest point. The famous Garry Kasparov achieved a rating of 2851 back in 1999.

At any rate, watching the long death match from yesterday what was interesting is the very end. When Nepo finally resigned on move 136, they immediately began talking. Nepo says something to the effect of what about this coordinate? What if Knight e5 instead. This refers back to a pivotal moment in the game many moves back. They both instantly know and understand what each other is talking about. No reference required, no setup of the board, no intro of “remember on that one move where I had a choice between moving the knight here or there? No none of that, they both knew the moment in question. Two absolutely brilliant minds locked in a struggle for 8 hours.

So the theme is that you are your best moves, but I wonder if that is really true? Nepo and Carlsen are not their best moves, they are a culmination of thousands and thousands of hours of game time, move analysis and practice. Makes you realize what the commitment is to become really good at something.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x