Day 279 – Effects of Artificial Stress

After a challenging week backpacking in the wilderness, the author found their sleep quality dramatically improved compared to their restless nights at home. This experience highlighted the difference between 'real' stress encountered in nature and the constant 'artificial' stress from digital demands, suggesting that true rest may depend on the absence of these pervasive digital pokes at our nervous system.

I noticed it as soon as I got back: my phone was trying to get my attention again. A streaming app. A social app. A game. After a week in a remote wilderness with poor food, high elevation, discomfort, and real problems to solve, that small moment felt like the clearest answer to why I had started sleeping again.

Before that trip, I had been having difficulty sleeping. Then I spent a week backpacking in an absolutely remote wilderness. It was not restful in the usual sense. It was hard. It was uncomfortable. I dealt with highly stressful situations in difficult backcountry. And yet when it was over, I felt more rested and more relaxed than I had before I left. My sleep quality improved dramatically.

That contrast stayed with me.

Real stress and artificial stress

Out there, the stress was real, but it was clean. I had immediate problems in front of me. They needed my attention, and they asked something concrete from me. I was dealing with remoteness, elevation, discomfort, and the basic demands of getting through the trip.

None of that was easy. But it was direct.

When I came home, I returned to normal life and all the creature comforts. I was physically safer. I was more comfortable. I had better food, a bed, and convenience. On paper, I should have relaxed even more.

Instead, I noticed how quickly the usual noise came back.

My phone was full of small demands. A show to watch. A feed to check. A game to open. Each one was minor by itself. None of it looked like danger. None of it looked serious. But all of it wanted something from me.

That is what changed.

The body still keeps score

The body does not treat simulated stress as identical to real life danger, but it also does not ignore it. If an experience feels intense enough, it can still create real cortisol and dopamine responses. Over time, constant high arousal media exposure may keep a person more activated than they realize.

I think that is closer to what I was feeling before the trip.

It was not one large problem. It was a constant stream of smaller signals. Attention here. Reward there. Tension, release, novelty, anticipation. Not enough to feel dramatic, but enough to keep the system from settling down.

"We may never fully relax because we are constantly bombarding ourselves with artificial stress."

In the wilderness, I had actual stress, but I did not have that endless layer of simulated urgency. There were no apps competing for my attention. No steady drip of media pulling on the mind. The hard parts of the trip were still hard, but they ended when they ended. They belonged to the moment. They did not follow me into every spare second.

That may be why I came back more rested than when I left.

What I am paying attention to now

I used to think rest was mostly about comfort. Better conditions. Fewer problems. More convenience. But this experience made me wonder if rest also depends on the absence of artificial demands.

Maybe the issue is not that modern life is too difficult. Maybe it is that it never stops poking at the nervous system.

A week in remote wilderness gave me poor food, high elevation, discomfort, and stressful problems to solve. It also gave me something I did not realize I was missing: silence from the machines that always want a response.

So I keep coming back to that moment when I got home and saw the apps reaching for me again. That was the opening scene, and now it feels like the lesson too. My next step is simple: I am going to start removing those digital bids for attention and see how much real rest returns with them gone.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 3,228 – Reduce Decision Latency

The author explores the cost of indecision, drawing inspiration from a former Tesla executive’s emphasis on decision speed. They argue that while deliberation is important, fear of being wrong often leads to unnecessary delays. The author advocates for a proactive approach to decision-making, emphasizing action, feedback, and adaptability over endless speculation.

Read More

Day 3,227 – Growth Requires Excursions

This piece explores the balance between consistency and growth, using the metaphor of a familiar running route. It argues that while routines provide stability, true growth comes from deliberately stepping outside of our comfort zones and embracing new, sometimes uncomfortable, experiences.

Read More

Day 3,226 – Your Desk Is Your Brain

This article explores the idea that your desk is a reflection of your mind. It suggests that the clutter and organization of your workspace can mirror your thoughts, priorities, and even avoided decisions. The author challenges readers to organize their desks as a way to clear their minds.

Read More

Day 3,225 – The Sunk Cost Fallacy

The sunk cost fallacy describes the tendency to continue investing in a losing proposition because of past investments that cannot be recovered. This often leads to greater losses and regret. The key is to evaluate if future rewards justify additional investment, or if it’s better to cut losses.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x