The Ought and the Should

Early this morning, I read an research paper published by Tony Higgins in 1987.  This paper was on “self-discrepancy.” Essentially, he proposed that humans have three basic views of themselves. The view of who they actually are, the view of who they “ought” to be and the view of who they ideally “should” be.  If there really is three distinct categories is up to some debate, but the concept is interesting to explore.

I think everyone does have a real sense of who they actually are. They may not admit that to others, but they probably really do understand who they actually are. They may not want to admit it, or try to hide it, but generally we know who we are. What is complicated is that gets confused often by who we think we “ought” to be and who we “should” be. This is where we produce feelings of anxiety and discouragement.

What was interesting about this research is that there was a clear distinction on what are of our view of self generates specific feelings. It seems rather obvious, but Social Anxiety is usually created from the view of who we “ought” to be. We have a view of what is expected of us by others. That is what creates the most anxiety. When we feel discouragement that leads to depression. This research indicates that occurs mostly when we have a discrepancy between who we actually are and who we feel we “should” be.

This research, and most research in this same area, always has similar conclusions. This is probably the key takeaway. If you want to reduce feelings of anxiety and depression then you need to bring your view of what you “ought” and “should” closer to who you actually are. That can be done in two major ways. First – by actually improving yourself. That is a big one. The second is to change what you view you “ought” or “should” be. That is actually harder, because it is not always in your control.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 360 – The Concept of Eudaimonia

Aristotle’s concept of eudaimonia, or the highest human good, suggests that true happiness comes from aligning our actions with our cherished virtues over a sustained period, rather than from fleeting pleasures. This involves living a life that feels purposeful and authentic, even through struggles.

Read More

Day 359 – Opinionated or Good Judgement?

The distinction between having an opinion and being opinionated lies in how strongly and frequently one expresses their views, and their openness to others’ perspectives. While strong opinions can be admired when backed by expertise, constant and forceful expression across various topics can be perceived as arrogance or exhausting. The key to being seen as having good judgment rather than being opinionated is to deliver opinions appropriately and remain open to new evidence.

Read More

Day 358 – We Remember Legend

This article explores the concept of legend versus history, arguing that legends are what people choose to remember and retell over generations. Using the story of Noah’s Ark as an example, it discusses how historical events can become exaggerated and imbued with cultural meaning, posing the question of what makes a legend meaningful enough to endure. The author also reflects on personal and family legends, and contemplates what actions in their own life might become legendary for future generations.

Read More

Day 357 – Curiosity is Cheap

This article explores the challenges introverts face with draining conversations and offers a solution: embracing curiosity. By shifting from feeling the need to “perform” in conversations to simply being curious and asking questions, the perceived energy cost of interactions can be significantly reduced, fostering better relationships.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x