Not all work is the same, and not all work should be the same priority. So when you take on tasks, do you have a queuing strategy? If you do not then you run a very high and real risk that you will end up spending more time than you should on tasks that are not that important to you and your goals. So what are some possible queuing strategies?

FIFO and LIFO basically stand for first in and first out, and last in first out. Most people accidently do LIFO. They work on the thing that just came up first and the overdue stuff continues to be delayed. The problem with either of these is that they do NOT consider appropriateness or applicability to your personal goals in life. You become victim to all the others around you assigning you tasks.

The concept of queuing and the consideration behind dealing with backlog, or people in line, or things to do has been around a long time. This became a formal area of research in and around World War 2. Clearly, the logistical challenges of a world war really impacted our ability to work on, ship out, deploy what was more important and what needed attention first.

It was after this queuing theory really exploded and there is a lot to learn by reviewing some of those developments. One, for example, was the concept of Shortest Processing Time First. Meaning, what you work on is what you can knock out the fastest. Anyway, not going to dive into all of those theories, there are many. The important point is to have a conscious, mindful approach to what you work on first and why. The better you get at this, the more time you will spend on what is important to you and the faster you will achieve your goals.

Guy Reams

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share the Post:

Recent Blogs

Day 328 – Would You Trust Your Brain?

The author explores the idea of copying a human brain into an AI and questions the trustworthiness of such an AI, highlighting human biases and limitations. The piece argues that AI excels in repetitive tasks and factual recall but will never truly think like a human. It also delves into the author’s personal frustration with an AI agent, revealing that the frustration stemmed from their own inadequacy and unwillingness to plan, rather than the AI’s limitations. The author concludes by suggesting that AI’s “flaws” often reflect human tendencies and a lack of clarity in communication.

Read More

Day 327 – We Need God

This article explores the practical necessity of a concept of God, regardless of personal belief in a literal deity. It argues that humans need a higher, fixed point of reference to establish values, prevent self-serving rationalizations, and guide their aspirations beyond immediate desires and worldly pursuits.

Read More

Day 326 – Small Things Do Not Automatically Compound

This article explores the idea that while small, consistent actions are powerful, they don’t automatically compound into significant results. It emphasizes that mindful repetition, reflection, and adjusting the process are crucial to ensure habits remain effective and aligned with their original purpose.

Read More

Day 325 – All Loops Require Supervision

The author shares two anecdotes—an AI system stuck in a loop and a sprinkler system with a hidden leak—to illustrate the critical need for supervision, even in automated processes. The core message is that automation reduces mental load but doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to monitor systems and routines to ensure they continue to serve their intended purpose and don’t cause unforeseen harm.

Read More
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x